Le Mans: good BoP, bad BoP 

The Balance of Performance probably won’t decide who wins the Le Mans 24 Hours this year. But it could determine who doesn’t. In the two years since the mass influx of manufacturers into the World Endurance Championship’s Hypercar class there have been haves and have nots in terms of the BoP at its blue riband event in France in the middle of June.

It wouldn’t be a stretch to say that there were only a handful of manufacturers who could win the big race in 2023 and ’24. The BoP, the means by which the playing field is levelled in Hypercar, didn’t give everyone a fighting chance. It was pretty much Ferrari vs Toyota each time, with Cadillac not far behind in ’23 and, along with Porsche, again in ’24. There’s room for improvement, and the WEC rule makers, the FIA and the Automobile Club de l’Ouest, concede that. The system by which the BoP is calculated remains a work in progress, they say. There have been further tweaks for 2025 as they refine a process driven by race data brought in last year. That included the introduction of the ‘power gain’ element at Le Mans, an adjustment of the maximum performance from the powertrain allowed above 155mph.

A tool that aims to balance the straight-line speeds of the cars is more relevant on the Circuit de la Sarthe with its four flat-out blasts, on the Mulsanne Straight and then on the run to Indianapolis, than anywhere else on the WEC calendar. A season’s worth of experience with ‘power gain’ could be crucial as the FIA and the ACO strive to bring the field together for the most prestigious race of the year.

The problem is that an eight-and-a-half-mile circuit, which is more than 50% public road, is the outlier on the schedule. It’s why the WEC organisation insists that the French race has its own BoP, without explaining exactly what that means.

Toyota chairman Akio Toyoda criticised changes to the BoP in 2023

Toyota chairman Akio Toyoda criticised changes to the BoP in 2023

Getty Images

The BoP for the regular WEC introduced for last year is distinct from the one in force in 2023 when simulation was the primary tool used in its calculation. That was when the rule makers unilaterally changed the BoP at short notice ahead of the first track action at Le Mans – although the guidelines laid down to the manufacturers said they couldn’t. This wiped out Toyota’s large advantage in the opening three races and handed a narrower one to Ferrari.

The FIA and ACO admit that simulation is still a key tool in the formulation of the Le Mans BoP courtesy of the unique characteristics of the circuit. Given that the BoP can’t change – or rather shouldn’t under the latest guidelines – between the pre-event Test Day, the Sunday ahead of race week, and the race itself, they have one opportunity to get it right.

The pressure is on with an increasing number of factories on the grid for them to get the BoP bang on the money. Because that’s why manufacturers are spending large amounts to chase victory. Success comes with a prestige that significantly outweighs that attached to winning any of the end-of-season silverware on offer in the WEC. For all the continuing growth of the Hypercar division, the have nots might decide they don’t want to continue putting their hands in their pockets.

No one wants to go to Le Mans without a chance of a result.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Le Mans 2025: what to expect

Taken from Motor Sport, June 2025


1 Ferrari goes for the hat-trick

Ferrari will keep the trophy if it completes a Le Mans 24 Hours hat-trick with the 499P Le Mans Hypercar: the car remains unbeaten at the French enduro since the Italian manufacturer ended its 50-year factory hiatus from the front of the grid in 2023. But Ferrari’s avowed aim this season is winning a World Endurance Championship title after missing out in each of the past two years.

That’s not to say Ferrari isn’t serious about winning Le Mans again. Double points are on offer, so it remains the most important race of the season not just in terms of prestige.

Ferrari has undertaken a no-stone-unturned approach to development of the 499P since its second Le Mans victory. That is, of course, within the confines of the rules that place strict limits on performance upgrades. One so-called evo joker modification was brought online for the Brazilian WEC round at Interlagos last July and there have been none since.

The focus has been on getting the most out of its package – that includes improving reliability. Ferrari wasn’t happy with the failures that blunted its WEC challenge in 2024 and that will clearly be of benefit in its bid to win the season’s longest race.


2 Toyota looking for legacy victory

A shade over a minute and a half. That’s the cumulative time by which Toyota has lost victory to Ferrari at Le Mans over the past two years. The Japanese manufacturer’s GR010 Hybrid might have triumphed both times with a bit of luck — or rather less misfortune — and taken a remarkable seven wins on the trot. It didn’t work out that way, which means that Toyota is still missing a victory at the French enduro against serious opposition.

Toyota’s trio of Sébastien Buemi, Brendon Hartley and Ryo Hirakawa in this season’s WEC No8 car have eight Le Mans 24 Hours wins between them

Toyota’s trio of Sébastien Buemi, Brendon Hartley and Ryo Hirakawa in this season’s WEC No8 car have eight Le Mans 24 Hours wins between them

Getty Images

Its five wins on the trot between 2018 and ’22 came against what can only be described as limited opposition: the first three were at the end of the LMP1 era after Audi and Porsche had departed and the next two at the start of the Hypercar era before the big influx of major makers. A win this time around against seven rival OEMs would cement the legacy of a marque that has been a constant at the Circuit de la Sarthe since 2012.

That experience of Le Mans means Toyota will be in the mix. But getting the job done is becoming harder year on year as more manufacturers come into the fray. In terms of pace Toyota only had to beat Ferrari in ’23 and ’24, and failed to do so.


3 Porsche aims for the big one

Porsche’s big target for this year is victory at Le Mans. It has to be after a season in 2024 in which its 963 LMDh won titles in both the WEC and the IMSA SportsCar Championship in North America.

A quick glance at the results from Le Mans last year would suggest that Porsche wasn’t a million miles away from a 20th outright win. The best of the Porsche Penske Motorsport factory entries in fourth position finished just over half a minute down on the winning Ferrari. The reality, however, was that the Porsche shared by the title-winning trio of Laurens Vanthoor, Kévin Estre and André Lotterer wasn’t a genuine contender. The 963 was tenths, not seconds, off the pace and, perhaps more pertinently, lacked straight-line speed compared with the Ferraris and the Toyota ahead of it. It was, put simply, a less raceable machine.

Porsche scored its 19th Sebring 12 Hours win this year, and also won the Daytona 24 Hours. Can it complete the set?

Porsche scored its 19th Sebring 12 Hours win this year, and also won the Daytona 24 Hours. Can it complete the set?

Porsche AG

A new element of the Balance of Performance was introduced at Le Mans last year: called ‘power gain’, the intent is to equate the top speeds by tweaking the mandated maximum power above and below 155mph for each marque. With a year’s experience, there’s a fighting chance of getting all the cars in the same ballpark.

Don’t bet against a Porsche win. It’s again doing everything to maximise its chances by fielding three factory cars.


4 Cadillac’s time to shine

The big underachiever in the WEC since the Hypercar era began has a big chance to deliver on the promise of the past two years. Not only has Cadillac’s full-season factory campaign been taken over by the British Jota squad, a team with no fewer than 10 Le Mans class podium finishes in LMP2 and an outright WEC victory to its name, but there’s also an expanded presence from the General Motors brand on the grid for the 24 Hours.

The big plus for Caddy is that Jota is running two of its V-Series.R LMDhs in the full world championship season, unlike its predecessor Chip Ganassi Racing. There’s no doubt that Cadillac’s WEC campaigns were held back by the single-car entry, even if Ganassi expanded its effort in France in June by bringing over its IMSA car.

1000_Cadillac-Hertz-Team-JOTA_Liveryunveil2025_ND-copy

In IMSA’s GTP category this season BMW’s M Hybrid V8 has proved its pace

Nick Duncan

Cadillac will have the biggest factory Hypercar presence on the grid with four cars – Porsche is represented with three works cars and one privateer. Action Express Racing, IMSA champion with the V-Series.R in 2023, is back for its third consecutive Le Mans, while Wayne Taylor Racing makes its debut at the big race. WTR is, as the Americans like to say, one of the ‘winningest’ teams in North American sports car racing and has big ambitions to add a Le Mans victory to its triumphs at the Daytona, Sebring and Petit Le Mans enduros in its homeland.

The V-Series.R has proven pace at Le Mans. It took third on its debut in 2023 and the best of the Ganassi cars was a genuine contender until the final hours last year. A broken underfloor resulted in it fading to seventh.


5 BMW on the up

BMW maintained the momentum that propelled it towards the front of the field in the final races of the 2024 WEC and IMSA series into the new season. The German manufacturer had the pace to win the Daytona 24 Hours IMSA curtain-raiser back in January but lacked the luck, and was then the second-fastest car behind the dominant Ferraris in the WEC opener in Qatar at the end of February.

In IMSA’s GTP category this season BMW’s M Hybrid V8 has proved its pace

In IMSA’s GTP category this season BMW’s M Hybrid V8 has proved its pace

Brandon Badraoui

That suggests BMW can build on the promise it showed at Le Mans last year. Dries Vanthoor, pole winner at the Daytona and Sebring IMSA races this year, was quickest in opening qualifying at Le Mans in 2024 and the M Hybrid V8 LMDh showed promise in the race on its Le Mans debut, even if its two cars were both sadly out of contention early on.

It would be wrong to call BMW a dark horse given its early season form. It has to be regarded as a genuine contender as it bids to follow up its 1999 Le Mans victory with the V12 LMR.


6 Racing for French pride

This is a big Le Mans for the two French manufacturers competing in Hypercar. Peugeot returns for a third crack at the race with its 9X8 LMH having so far
never looked like repeating its La Sarthe victories of previous years with the 905 3.5-litre Group C contender (1992 and ’93) and the first-generation 908 HDi LMP1 turbodiesel (2009).

Alpine, meanwhile, is looking to make up for 2024’s disastrous attempt when both its A424 LMDhs were out of the race before quarter distance.

There was no luck for the French Hypercars at 2024’s Le Mans – Peugeot was the highest-placed finisher, way down in 11th

There was no luck for the French Hypercars at 2024’s Le Mans – Peugeot was the highest-placed finisher, way down in 11th

The heavily revised 2024 version of the 9X8, complete with a conventional rear wing, was probably too new to shine at Le Mans last year. Twelve months on there can be no excuses.

An issue with the valve train resulted in the early bath for Alpine last year. It managed the problem through the second half of the maiden campaign for the A424 and made progress towards the front of the field. If le tricolore is waved on the podium after the race, the smart money will be on Alpine drivers doing the waving.


7 A new qualifying format

Le Mans broke with its long traditions when it introduced Hyperpole qualifying in 2020: the grid had been set over multiple sessions for time immemorial. The short, sharp shock format has now been tweaked in the name of increased spectacle.

Instead of eight cars progressing from a one-hour session for the entire grid on Wednesday evening to the Hyperpole session a day later, the field will be split up and another round of qualifying added. Fifteen Hypercars will go through from one opening 30-minute session and the top 12 in each of LMP2 and LMGT3 from a second period of the same duration.

Hyperpole or hyperbole? Le Mans has tweaked its high-drama qualifying format

Hyperpole or hyperbole? Le Mans has tweaked its high-drama qualifying format

DPPI

Five Hypercars will be knocked out over 20 minutes in a session to be known as Hyperpole 1 or H1 with 10 going through to the 15-minute H2, which will set the first five rows of the grid. In P2 and LMGT3 eight cars will move forward into H2.

The idea is to build the drama through the two days of track running and it will certainly make for a better TV spectacle. Perhaps the real significance, though, is that the Hypercars have been split out from the other classes for qualifying. The old excuse about traffic in the Porsche Curves should become a thing of the past.


8 Mercedes is back

Mercedes is ending an absence from the 24 Hours that dates back to 1999 and its disastrous campaign with the CLR LMGTP coupé when it withdrew from the race on Saturday evening after a third aerial accident of the event. More than a quarter of a century on there will be a trio of Mercedes-AMG GT3 Evos on the grid fielded by the Italian Iron Lynx squad. The German manufacturer missed out on entries into the WEC in the new LMGT3, but it has made a belated entry a year on.

Absent from Le Mans since 1999, Mercedes makes a long-awaited return, albeit with an Iron Lynx-run GT3 racer, not a Hypercar

Absent from Le Mans since 1999, Mercedes makes a long-awaited return, albeit with an Iron Lynx-run GT3 racer, not a Hypercar

DPPI

When Iron Lynx’s relationship with Lamborghini – it ran its SC63 LMDh prototype as well the Huracán GT3 last year – broke down it jumped into bed with Mercedes for its campaign in the WEC’s secondary class. It fields two cars in the full series and has gained an additional entry for the 24 Hours.

Priority was given to GT3 manufacturers also competing in Hypercar when entries were allocated in the new-for-2024 class. There’s no indication that Merc has an LMDh or a Le Mans Hypercar on the stocks, but the return of a manufacturer that has won Le Mans twice, most recently with a Sauber-badged ‘Silver Arrow’ in 1989, is significant.


9 And LMP2…

The LMP2 prototype class, now a de facto one-make division for the ORECA 07 chassis, is bursting with quality on its annual return to Le Mans. There are 17 entries, one more than last year and two up on the 15-car minimum that race organiser the Automobile Club de l’Ouest has promised to maintain, and the majority of the top P2 contenders from around the world are present.

Wakefield-based United Autosports held off Polish team Inter Europol to take the LMP2 honours at Le Mans in 2024

Wakefield-based United Autosports held off Polish team Inter Europol to take the LMP2 honours at Le Mans in 2024

The British-based United Autosports squad, winner last year and in 2020, fields a pair of ORECA-Gibsons, ditto Inter Europol Competition, the Polish team that triumphed in 2023. The champion teams from the European and Asian Le Mans Series, AO by TF and Algarve Pro Racing, are present too.

Picking a winner in either the main P2 division or the Pro/Am sub-class that mandates a bronze-rated driver rather than a silver, is an invidious task. There can be no favourites in P2.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Ferrari F12 Berlinetta on tour

Dashing away from Le Mans on Sunday night is always a chore on the back of very little sleep. Better to take an extra day off work and head home at your leisure on the Monday – especially as that allows a chance to retrace the wheeltracks of the heroes you’ve just been watching.

The day after the Le Mans Classic, we took the Ferrari F12 Berlinetta for a tour of the bits of the Circuit de la Sarthe that are public road for most of the year. It’s an exercise that never grows old, especially at the wheel of something special.

Ferrari F12 Berlinetta white

There’s a delicious contrast between the spectacle of hard-core motor racing on a Sunday and a mundane rush hour on the same roads the following morning. We join the circuit between white vans and articulated trucks at Tertre Rouge, where the D338 passes under the D323 and becomes the Mulsanne. In traffic conditions we can happily bypass the dreaded chicanes – although a couple of roundabouts that are not in play for the racers break up the great straight anyway. Still, it’s enough to get a feel for the length of the famous stretch of road and take in the views the drivers absolutely don’t see from side to side as they pound down it during the race. The D338 is busy, but when we turn off at the Mulsanne Corner roundabout we find the D140, better known as the run up to Indianapolis and now the fastest part of the race track, is much quieter.

Accessibility gives everybody the chance to experience the Circuit de la Sarthe’s narrow confines

Accessibility gives everybody the chance to experience the Circuit de la Sarthe’s narrow confines

This is my favourite bit of Le Mans, largely because this remarkably narrow blast through the woods looks unchanged from previous eras. It’s so atmospheric and the Ferrari’s 6.3-litre V12 soundtrack just bounces off the trees in a pleasing manner.

The right-hand kink at Indianapolis is always more of a corner than you expect and it’s fun to imagine how it feels to brake heavily from 180mph for the banked left-hander. Today, the racing line would risk a head-on collision, which would be unfortunate in a car worth £240,000, so we stick to the wide line.

Ferrari F12 Berlinetta white rear

Arnage is a junction where the D139 crosses and here we turn right for my other favourite bit that hasn’t changed much. The force of the Ferrari’s incredible acceleration gives us a fleeting glimpse, just for a second, of what it must be like… But instead of sweeping right at the Porsche Curves, we trundle away from the track and down to the following roundabout. Barriers and a chap sternly wagging his finger warn us away from a cheeky blast along the circuit’s most challenging permanent race-track section.

Still, it had been a perfect coda to another memorable visit to a grand old lady among Europe’s race venues.

Ferrari F12 Berlinetta white rear

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Le Mans: vrooms with a view

Words Damien Smith  /  Taken from Motor Sport, February 2015


The past is present in any trip to Le Mans for purist pilgrims to the 24 Hours. We paused ours en route at Rouen to discover the glorious old Grand Prix circuit, retraced the original Le Mans course that led into the town itself, then lingered over the racing relics in the museum at the track’s entrance. Now we have another must-see diversion that will lure us for an hour or an afternoon during Le Mans week in June.

Pictured in Semblançay, Sunbeam’s drivers visited the hotel in 1923

Pictured in Semblançay, Sunbeam’s drivers visited the hotel in 1923

The Hotel de France has always been there. But now it is restored to its charming Art Deco best that made it a popular haven for race teams from the 1950s to the ’80s. It echoes to the days when drivers took refuge in its serenity, mechanics prepped Aston Martins, Triumphs, Ferraris and even Porsche 917s in its courtyards – and then drove them on the public road ready for action on the Circuit de la Sarthe.

HDF-Internal---Carroll-Shelby-room-detail

renovated interior

Renovated interior

The hotel reflects simpler days now romanticised by the passing of time, and its resurrection is all down to the enthusiasm of an Englishman abroad.

We paid a visit last July on the Friday before the Le Mans Classic meeting, picking up the scenic D304 to gallop the 25-odd miles south-east of the circuit to the picturesque village of La Chartre-sur-le-Loir. The sweeping road offered a flavour of how Le Mans used to be before the addition of Armco barriers and run-off areas, and in the thoroughbred Ferrari F12 Berlinetta we’d borrowed for the trip the drive alone was worth the trip.

129

Outside the hotel, the Place de la République was packed as gendarmes corralled a wide range of classics into the square. The F12 doesn’t count – yet – but I was directed to reverse park the Ferrari into the side courtyard. We recreated scenes from ancient photos when Ford GT40s squeezed in the same spot, and if it wasn’t for the stark modernity of the F12 you’d find it hard to believe that 50 years have passed.

134

Inside, every table was taken in the bustling dining area where the walls are plastered with fantastic photos, some of which we’ve reproduced here. There’s even specially commissioned wallpaper that tells the history of the hotel, which opened for business in 1905. Motor racing has a strong heritage in this part of France. Henry Segrave, who won the 1923 French GP in his Sunbeam on a road circuit north of Tours, dined at the hotel. Its reputation for food led John Wyer to the hotel in 1953. He was so enamoured, he made it his home during subsequent Le Mans weekends through the Aston Martin, GT40, 917 and Gulf Mirage years. Drivers such as Derek Bell, Jacky Ickx, Phil Hill, Jochen Rindt, Bruce McLaren, Carroll Shelby, Stirling Moss, Jackie Stewart and Mario Andretti also stayed regularly.

108

Decades later, businessman and racing enthusiast Martin Overington was bowled over by the charm of the place when a friend suggested they stay there for the 24 Hours in 2001. “We went back every year thereafter,” he says. “But I noticed over a period of five or six years that the hotel was dying off. Not to put too fine a point on it, the guys who were going there in the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s were falling off the perch… and there was no one younger feeding in from the bottom. I found this rather sad.”

“I noticed the hotel was dying off. I found that rather sad”

Overington would prove his credentials as a potential new owner in suitable fashion. “I bought a Bentley Blower six years or so ago and started racing it at Le Mans Classic, and I guess it must have been four and a half years ago that I finished the race and thought it would be a great idea to drive the Blower back to the hotel, with oil spewing out of it! But it got there. It was then that someone said, ‘Look, you really need to do something about this place, you’re the right person to do it’. And after a couple of bottles of good red wine I decided it was a fantastic idea, put the wheels in motion and made an offer. It got accepted, and then the panic set in about what I’d done!

A home to travelling teams, from Triumph (top) to TVR, De Tomaso and even Aston Martin

A home to travelling teams, from Triumph to TVR, De Tomaso and even Aston Martin

“It took two to three years to go through the rigmarole of physically buying it. It was fraught with various issues and we eventually completed the sale on December 10 last year [2013]. But then the biggest challenge was renovating the place to a standard that wouldn’t alienate our regulars or the guys that made their annual trip over for the 24 hours, while attracting younger Le Mans fans and bringing back the locals who’d left the hotel over a period of time.”

“After a couple of bottles of good red wine I made an offer. Then the panic set in about what I’d done!”

Having spent so long working on the sale completion, Overington didn’t waste time on a project that was a “passion” rather than a fortune generator. It helped that he’d made his money in exactly this business.

Bryan Miur/Jackie Oliver Ford GT40 in 1968

Bryan Miur/Jackie Oliver Ford GT40 in 1968

“We spent a lot of money on it and completely stripped the hotel,” he says. “All the rooms have been refurbished down to the last stitch. Everything is new: electrics, light fittings, plumbing. We shut it on New Year’s Day [2014], and then had three weeks before our first guests began to arrive. We used English labour because that’s my business: I build hotels and restaurants. So we imported everything, which we cleared with the French before we began because I was concerned they might boycott me. I spoke to all the local artisans and tradesmen in the village, they understood what we were doing and they let us get on with it. In fact they and the mayor were all incredibly supportive of us.”

the twin Gulf GR8s that finished first and third in 1975, the winner at the rear

The twin Gulf GR8s that finished first and third in 1975, the winner at the rear

That in itself sounds remarkable. “It is unusual, but I kind of made myself known to them over a period of about three years by driving French cars. I’ve got a 1952 2CV, Citroën DSs and a Citroën H Van which is used by the hotel. I became obvious to the village as an eccentric Englishman who loved French cars. I try to speak French too, and they got used to me. They’ve been fantastic. If there’d been another French hotel and I was trying to start a new one, it might have been a different matter. But the village appreciates the role the hotel plays within the local economy, so they’ve been supportive.”

Raymonde and Francis Pasteau pose with DP214s in 1963

Raymonde and Francis Pasteau pose with DP214s in 1963

Overington’s research into the hotel’s history continues to uncover fascinating snippets. The children of Presidents John F and Bobby Kennedy stayed here, and so did Steve McQueen. “Having been owned by the same family for 100 years the heritage they had built up was perhaps overlooked,” says Overington. “For the family, the hotel was their living, but to me it’s more than that. It’s a special place and it is that history which makes it unique.”

early Ford GT adventures in 1964

Early Ford GT adventures in 1964

The wonderful photos we present here were taken by the hotel’s former owner Noel Pasteau, and it was his son Francis who agreed to sell to the ‘eccentric Englishman’. “Monsieur Pasteau was a bit miffed when he first found out,” says Overington. “He didn’t know until the end of last year; they’d kept it quiet from him. I found him in the car park looking rather forlornly at the hotel in January when we were refurbishing it, so I marched him into the hotel to introduce him to everyone. When he saw what we were doing, and why, he gave us his blessing. He now visits for his morning coffee every day, which makes it all worthwhile. Even Jacky Ickx popped by unannounced and gave his approval!”

the sight of a Porsche 917 on a public street with a 2CV, standard...

The sight of a Porsche 917 on a public street with a 2CV, standard…

the square at La Chartre was a sight in 1971

The square at
La Chartre was a sight in 1971

For an Englishman to ingratiate himself so completely into a rural French community suggests Overington could switch careers and join the UN. But the locals have been won over because he’s always kept them at the heart of his plans. “The temptation is to make it a mecca for motoring, but it absolutely isn’t,” he insists. “It’s a local hotel in a local village for 50 weeks of the year, and quite frankly for most of its customers its association with motor racing is not the overriding factor. The rooms in the main hotel are named after drivers, but the only thing corresponding to that is a small portrait with a description. It’s not overtly about motor racing.”

Tony Brooks and Noël Cunningham-Reid’s Aston Martin DBR1 hits the road in 1957

Tony Brooks and Noël Cunningham-Reid’s Aston Martin DBR1 hits the road in 1957

Still, from what we saw the Hotel de France is already a ‘destination’ for car nuts, whether they drive Bentleys or Subaru Imprezas, and plans are brewing for special motoring events involving car clubs. Last season Derek Bell drove Overington’s Kenwood-sponsored Porsche 962 on the D304 as a lovely nod to the past, thanks to help from the local gendarmerie, and we can expect more of the same soon, perhaps with a Gulf theme.

“Derek Bell drove a Porsche 962 on the D304 as a nod to the past”

But as Overington says, the hotel needs to function beyond race weekends at Le Mans and for people who don’t necessarily love cars. “My long-term desire is to increase trade through the off-season, from November to March,” he says. “Certainly it’s a great destination for winter with open fire places and the village is beautiful that time of year. We’ll put on wine-tasting tours and visits to châteaux. And it’s less than two hours from Caen.”

The Brooks/Parnell Aston DBR1 in 1956, with Raoul Pasteau looking on

The Brooks/Parnell Aston DBR1 in 1956, with Raoul Pasteau looking on

You can bet the Place de la République will be mobbed on Le Mans weekend in 2015, and demand for rooms will be off the scale. Another option to enjoy the atmosphere at the hotel would be to camp a short walk away with travel experts Speed Chills, which is running one of its superb sites in La Chartre for the second time. A pleasant and civilised alternative to the usual Le Mans campsites is guaranteed.

Beyond the 24 Hours, a visit at a quieter time of year would have its own charms, as Martin suggests.

Jacky Ickx was a fan

Jacky Ickx was a fan

The countryside, towns and villages are a delight in this part of the world, just on the northern edge of the Loire valley. Perfect for a romantic weekend away – with only a tasteful and convenient hint of a motor racing link. We’d recommend it.


Essential travel guide

Where to stay
It’s possible that you might fancy taking in a round of the Peugeot RCZ Cup on the Bugatti Circuit, but the chances are that the 24 Hours will be your primary target. Just as at a grand prix, prices escalate when there’s a captive audience in town, but local residents let spare rooms on a B&B basis, the tram network connects the circuit to city hotels and camping abound. You can also find packages that include Channel crossing, race ticket and four nights in a nearby chateau. That said, it’s Le Mans: you should be prepared to sleep al fresco, on Saturday evening at least.

Route tips
By road, it’s better to avoid Paris – although that is an option if you want to watch locals forcing Peugeot 407s into parking spaces big enough for only a Twingo. Instead, take the A16 west from Calais and thread via Boulogne towards Rouen on the A28 and then south on the A11 to Le Mans – allow about 3hrs 45min for the trip. The alternative is to travel to Paris by air or train, then catch a TGV from Montparnasse to Le Mans: that bit takes about an hour, less than half the time it would take to complete the same journey by car. If you happen to own an executive jet, there is a convenient airstrip directly opposite the circuit. If ever you should have the privilege of arriving by plane, it’s quite something to see the familiar asphalt silhouette from above.

Interesting diversions
The Musée des 24 Heures du Mans is worth a visit when you get there, but Rouen is the most obvious place for motor sport tourists to pause. Racing ceased at the French GP’s five-time home in the early 1990s, all circuit furniture was demolished in 1999 and its signature – a cobbled hairpin – is now asphalt. It is still possible to drive most of a lap, though, and in parts you can see the crumbling remains of what used to be grandstand steps. From Rouen, head south-west towards Elbeuf,
locate the D938 and dream.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Le Mans 1998: The Beginning

Sunday June 7, 1998. The day three-time Le Mans winner Allan McNish won the greatest race of them all for Porsche on just his second visit to Le Mans. The team of drivers that year – Laurent Aïello, Stéphane Ortelli and McNish – had only four Le Mans under their belts. It’s a day that should live long in the memory for the Scot.

Except it doesn’t (without a nudge).

“Is it?” he laughs, “18 years today? Bloody hell. Well there you go.”

L-R McNish, AÏello, Ortelli

L-R McNish, AÏello, Ortelli

It was the brilliant Porsche GT1 that took a young racer looking for his next move from F3000 onto the path of joining sports car’s best. Aïello was his old F3000 team-mate and Ortelli had just three appearances to his name at La Sarthe – twice in GT2, once partnering McNish at Porsche in GT1 in 1997.

“That doesn’t really count, we went off after half an hour…” he smiles. “We were a totally inexperienced team – we were like three kids. We had no idea what the pressure was; we were too inexperienced for that. Norbert Singer was the puppet master, we were just his puppets. We thought we were doing the job at the time but in reality we were at the end of Norbert’s strings.”

It was McNish’s first victory and Porsche’s last for seven years, disappearing from the top of sports car racing with win number 16 and a 1-2 safely under its belt. The 911 GT1-98 had beaten the faster Mercedes CLKs of its class and the faster BMW and Toyota LMP1s in an attritional encounter.

GettyImages-2201168843-scaled.jpg

They beat some of the biggest hitters, too: Tom Kristensen shared the new Williams-assisted BMW V12LM with Hans-Joachim Stuck and Steve SoperKlaus Ludwig partnered Bernd Schneider and rising star Mark Webber for Mercedes, with that crew taking pole. Michele AlboretoStefan Johansson and Yannick Dalmas, seven wins between them even then, shared a Porsche LMP1. Such is Le Mans, those three cars combined managed fewer than 200 laps.

“Le Mans was the only race the GT1 won. But that’s all it had to do, win the big one”

The Porsches weren’t without their own issues during the race. Neither of the Joest-entered LMP1-98s – a development of the 95 that had won the year before, itself a development of Jaguar’s XJR-14 – finished and both the McNish/Ortelli/Aïello GT1 and that of Bob WollekJörg Müller and Uwe Alzen suffered at points during the race.

“I remember coming past the pits seeing the two Mercedes sitting on the right-hand side of the circuit. The main competition was out of the race just a few hours in.

“Later I came out of the first chicane to put a lap on my team-mate, who was in second place and had just gone through the gravel and the next lap our water temperature started rising.

Le Mans 1998 featured big-hitters like Mercedes, Toyota and BMW,  but Porsche out-lasted them.

Le Mans 1998 featured big-hitters like Mercedes, Toyota and BMW, but Porsche out-lasted them.

“I’m sitting in the pits up on stands and across from me is the sister car, also up on stands. In that moment I thought any chance of a victory had gone. From a one-lap lead and being in total control to suddenly realising you’re out of control one lap later was the absolute high and low.

“We got back out and had the ding-dong with the Toyota. Then we came across it stopped at the side of the road turning into the Porsche Curves. On the podium we had the first-ever selfie!”

A grandstand finish was denied. But it was during the night that the GT1 turned what could have easily been disaster into a winning position, according to McNish: “It started drizzling at about one in the morning and we were on slicks. It wasn’t enough to come in to change to wets, but it was also too much to have a lot of confidence on those tyres in those conditions. We managed to take some big time out of the opposition. That really was a key moment.”

sheer joy from McNish

Sheer joy from McNish

Getty Images

It was also a key moment in his own career. And because of that the Porsche 911 GT1-98 is a car that will always retain something of a special place in McNish’s memory, even if the date sometimes takes a little bit of reminding.

“It was a beautiful car. The styling of it was fantastic. Le Mans was the only race it won: we were leading at Silverstone, fighting for the lead at Laguna Seca and Japan. But it only actually won Le Mans. But that’s all it had to do. It won the big one. It was designed to do just that. The victory catapulted my career back into the spotlight. The next year I went back with Toyota and we were leading when my team-mate Thierry Boutsen got hit by a GT car in the middle of the night. Our was race over, but the impact had also broken his back. You go to Le Mans in the knowledge that you could come home with a victory or with the most horrible, empty feeling you can have. If you know you’ve got a chance, you know you’ve got to take it. It doesn’t always work out.”

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Choose your enemies well

One question on Audi back in the 2000s, and which was also relevant to Toyota more recently in sports car racing, was: who were you beating? The first people we had to beat were our team-mates. There was always an internal rivalry. Emanuele Pirro and I, for example, always had a pretty strong rivalry, Frank Biela less so because he was fully laid-back. There were a few times when we got into wheel banging because only one of us was going to end up winning, whether it was Le Mans, Sebring or a championship.

But even in 2005 when we were up against Pescarolo they had a huge performance advantage back then and there were a few times when we were definitely on the back foot. Then Peugeot came along – a manufacturer rival using the same technology with their own diesel powertrain. That was a straight fight with two very different mentalities. There was the approach of all-out speed, go for it, intra-team rivalry and everything else, which was Peugeot. Then there was a slightly more Le Mans-focused, intra-team all working together, one car supporting the other (even if we didn’t want to), which was Audi. Very different mentalities on each side of the fence.

Chased by a Porsche LMP2 in the BoP’d American Le Mans Series in 2007

Chased by a Porsche LMP2 in the BoP’d American Le Mans Series in 2007

Getty Images

Also don’t forget in North America there were the LMP2s with BoP regulations to make them equivalent in performance. So we had Acura and Porsche to race against. You came from racing against Peugeot, which was like two heavyweights punching the hell out of each other, which was really cool. I enjoyed the aggressiveness, butting heads against each other before getting in the car, then you knew you had to deliver. But on the other side we got to America and faced some oddities. I remember we went to Salt Lake City. With our huge torque and speed in LMP1 and a more than kilometre-long straight we expected to be on pole. We were eighth on the grid. Everything was LMP2 in front of us because there were loads of corners, so that racing dynamic was different. You had to be agile and think all the way to the end. That was super-competitive and I really enjoyed that era.

When it came to Le Mans the fights with Peugeot were slugging matches. Bruno Famin, future principal at Alpine in F1, was the technical director at Peugeot. If we were successful Bruno would say, “Well done” – not everyone in their organisation would do that! We tried to stay within the borderline, even if on occasion we stepped over it.

Sebring in 2009 is one of my favourite memories. It was the hardest-fought race I did: 12 hours of being absolutely on it and there was no other way to win. There was no hiding place, against a manufacturer with equivalent technology and equipment. Then there’s Petit Le Mans in 2008 when I shunted on the way to the grid and came back. That is one of my favourites from a results point of view.

McNish ended 2007 as joint champion in ALMS with Audi team-mate Capello – a repeat of the previous season

McNish ended 2007 as joint champion in ALMS with Audi team-mate Capello – a repeat of the previous season

Le Mans 2008? The second of my three Le Mans wins is considered one of the greatest editions of Le Mans, when we faced a faster Peugeot. The year before we had been leading comfortably when a wheel came off on Sunday morning. After that I thought, “I’m never going win another one because how the hell can I do more?” I’d led every Le Mans I’d raced in between my win in 1998 and it always slipped away. That year we were dominant, two laps in the lead and then it was gone. In 2008 we weren’t as competitive in comparison to Peugeot, in fact we were slow and we knew it. At Spa we had developed some aero for the rear wing which in the wind tunnel gave nothing, but we stuck it on. It allowed me as a driver to take more out of the car. I don’t know why, it just gave me that little extra feel and we could pressure Peugeot more. That exposed a bit of a weakness.

That was the little bit of hope I had. But as soon as we saw the qualifying times that disappeared! Then it was a case of slugging it out and seeing where we got to, not necessarily with the belief we’d win.

I’ve got one of those cars, although not the 2008 Le Mans winner. It’s the R10 that I raced in 2006 and ’07, in which I won the American Le Mans Series with Dindo. I bought it a few years ago and it’s sitting in one of Dindo’s Audi dealerships. It’s my favourite car. Difficult to drive. You had to pick it up and menace it. But it fitted my style of driving and the era better than anything else.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Allan McNish on his Le Mans triple

My driving career spanned four decades, from junior karting in the 1980s through to my final season with Audi in 2013. The first decade of the millennium was certainly a busy and rewarding time in my life, and included a renewed involvement in Formula 1, testing and then racing with Toyota in 2002 and then as reserve driver at Renault just as that team was growing into a world championship-winning force.

That period allowed me to compare how F1 had evolved since the early to mid-1990s when I was a test driver for McLaren and then Benetton. Back then, there was a lot in F1 that was experimental: four-wheel steering, active ride, semi-automatic to full automatic gearboxes. There was a heck of a lot going on in the cockpit, but it was all pretty rudimentary: capable, but basic in comparison to where it got to later on. Now a lot of those systems we worked on were banned, but by the turn of the millennium F1 cars had still moved on to be higher-performing vehicles. Except in one regard: the tyres, which were grooved, a regulation change introduced in 1998 to reduce grip and slow the cars down. Sometimes Bridgestone got it right, sometimes Michelin.

Allan McNish returned to sports cars with Audi in ’04

Allan McNish returned to sports cars with Audi in ’04

Audi AG

You had other variables between the teams too, but F1 had gone from lots of basic ideas to being very fine-tuned and honed. The other thing was the gap from the front to the back of the grid was much smaller. The team averages were much closer by the early 2000s than they had been 10 years earlier, while heavy-hitter OEMs like Toyota were coming in, spending big. As a championship, technically it had become much more of a pinnacle.

The manufacturer influx meant an expansion in the size of the teams, from a few hundred employees to up to 1000. Now manufacturers were building their own engines and customer teams found themselves in a more difficult position, never mind that budgets were uncapped. You look at it in comparison to now and it appears insane.

We had unlimited testing, so each driver was doing around 60 days, and in 2003 at Renault we would often use two engines per day in testing. That’s something manufacturers could do, but customers couldn’t. The regulations today have evolved with an eye on sustainability for the whole of the grid because it’s not good to have entries that are compromised from the word go.

“Toyota is held up as a prime example of an OEM getting F1 wrong”

Toyota, with hindsight, is held up as being a prime example of an OEM getting F1 wrong. At the time it wasn’t that straightforward. I’m sure we could all see signs that the writing was on the wall, but we didn’t necessarily act upon it as you would if you were to replay the scenario. The fact of the matter is my team-mate Mika Salo and his engineer Humphrey Corbett were the only two people on the team at the first grand prix in 2002 with any F1 experience. There was a lot of motor sport experience, but not in that niche area, so we were on a bit of a learning curve. It was also clear that the 2002 car wasn’t fit for purpose and they correctly stopped development of it and went straight to 2003. One other factor: the expectations were completely wrong. There was a misalignment of where we were in real terms in comparison to the competition and that set a very unrealistic expectation of where we would finish at the end of the season.

McNish, Dindo Capello, Audi’s team chief Wolfgang Ullrich and Tom Kristensen, Le Mans winners, 2008

McNish, Dindo Capello, Audi’s team chief Wolfgang Ullrich and Tom Kristensen, Le Mans winners, 2008

Getty Images

Being very blunt about it, from my personal point of view the 2002 season was too late in my career to be making my F1 racing debut. In the early 1990s with McLaren and Benetton, with the momentum I had, it could have been a different story. But when the opportunity came up, what was I going to say? It was a straightforward decision. But it was too late, especially in a car that wasn’t quick enough. It was a case of survival, to a great extent. That was brought home to me when Toyota switched Mika and I out, Flavio Briatore called me and I did a deal as reserve at Renault.

My very first lap in the Renault was around Barcelona, and it was quicker than my qualifying lap in the Toyota the previous year. And I was on full tanks, just rubbing off the dust after a winter sitting at home. That was the realisation point of how far we had been from the pace the year before. Even though the grid had closed up the gulf in difference between the ‘wannabees’ and those fighting for wins was significant. Also it was a realisation that I did not want to be back to that scenario where I could say I was a racing driver in F1, but without the power to actually do anything. If I was going to race, it needed to be something competitive, even if it was away from F1. Enter Le Mans.


That leads me to my long association with Audi in sports cars. The first thing I’d say is this was a ‘handshake organisation’. When I did the deal with Dr Ullrich for 2000 it was on a handshake and he stood by it. There was a certain honour there, it wasn’t about the detailed words in the contract. The second thing, you got the feeling it really was a family and he was the godfather. And it had a clear purpose. Audi had budget, no question, but they were an engineering-led company, a car company led from top to bottom by engineers. That gave it a certain difference in mentality because it was not a marketing project. It was to show the technical ability of the company, which is why they started rallying in the 1980s. Sports cars was to show their sports credibility and credentials – it’s in the name – and from that it led directly to the birth of the R8 road car.

As a racing organisation, Audi was like a supertanker. Sometimes it took a long time to change direction, but when it did there was no stopping it – it was going. It was also black or white: you win or you lose. If you lose, what’s the reason? Fundamentally it was a robust engineering organisation which is why Audi won 13 out of its 18 Le Mans.

The first test I did for Audi in 2000 was with Tom Kristensen, who had just moved over from BMW, and we were stuck in the old R8R from the year before. It was at Sebring, on a short circuit I only experienced on that one occasion. We weren’t allowed to play with the new R8 – but actually when we eventually got into it I preferred the 1999 car. It was more compliant and I could maximise its performance straightaway – whereas with the R8, sure, it had a higher level of performance but it was quite pitchy, so over the bumps at Sebring it was fast but not easy to drive. The first experience didn’t lead me to believe it was going to dominate in 2000 and certainly never across the period it did.

McNish would end 2002 without a single F1 point

McNish would end 2002 without a single F1 point

DPPI

I left at the end of the year for Toyota and F1, then went back to Audi in 2004, by which time the R8 had TFSI direct injection. It had a different rear wing structure and set-up – and it was revolutionary. You could do whatever you wanted with it. It was so robust you could rallycross it! It was easy to drive, consistent and the driveability on the throttle was so much better. There had not been many visual changes but under the skin there was a lot that made it so much better.

As for the modular aspect of the R8’s design – how the team could remove and replace the whole rear end within minutes during a race – that was something I never even thought about until I was sitting in the pits at 4am and they were taking the gearbox off! We’d done some practice, but nothing in anger in race conditions.

From memory, the problem was actually a rear hub issue, but the quickest thing to do was change the whole back of the car. Then you had a fresh gearbox, uprights, brake discs, everything. It was much better than changing one part. It was so good they banned the practice.


In that era, sports car racing was where the big innovations were seen in motor sport because it had an open rulebook, which is one of the reasons Audi liked it. It also was a rulebook that allowed road car relevance. The technology side of it in the middle of that period was moving quicker than I ever expected. When Audi’s engine wizard Ulrich Baretzky said the successor to the R8 was going to be powered by diesel I thought he had been smoking something or drinking too much schnapps. Was it just a PR fad?

We always had a press conference at the Essen show and Frank Biela had just come back from testing the R10 at Vallelunga for the first time. He was the first to drive it and Tom, Dindo Capello and I were sitting there. So what was it like? He just smiled, then said. “You’ll never believe it, guys.” He couldn’t put it into words, because of the torque, the lack of noise. The sensations were so different to what we were used to. I drove that car for the first time at Sebring and there are a few things I remember from that first test. We had to increase the dash size for the display of which gear the car was in because I didn’t have a clue, especially on downshifts – you couldn’t hear the revs. Also when the air was rushing over your helmet at 200kph all you could hear was the wind noise. We were even thinking about piping engine noise into the ear plugs so the driver had some sort of feedback. We eventually went with a honking great display on the dash and obviously got used to it. But it was just such a change from what we knew.

 

A quick change at Le Mans in 2004, in which McNish finished at the wrong end of an Audi R8 1-2-3-5

A quick change at Le Mans in 2004, in which McNish finished at the wrong end of an Audi R8 1-2-3-5

DPPI

The hybrids a few years later, we knew that was coming and there had been some hybrid technology in sports car racing before, via Zytek. It was another case where you were building complexity into the car. You still had the engine with all the torque, but then how do you recover and boost energy, and where do you gain and use it? There were lots of different parameters to choose from, including whether you go for a front differential.

The way I describe it is we’d had 100 years of petrol engines, then within 10 years we went from petrol to diesel, diesel to hybrid, 50% hybrid power to full electric in Formula E. It was such an acceleration of technology and options.

Would I swap my time with another? The little boy in me would have loved to have driven in the 1970s but I don’t think I would be here now. My three Le Mans wins span three decades and I think the only other person who has done that is Tom.

We saw an evolution of technology in our era and at the time it was just making the next car faster. But when we look at it now it was changing times in the sport. Go back to the late 1980s/early 1990s you still had a manual gearbox, a radio button on the steering wheel, a drinks button and that was it. You had 200 people working at McLaren and they were the world champions. We had more than 200 people just at Le Mans. So, we saw a development of the sport advancing so quickly in all areas, and actually it was a super-cool time to be involved.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Renault revolution: the road to a French victory

Taken from Motor Sport, June 2003

Judging by how far the man holding the microphone-on-a-stick jumps back as the car fires up, our fervent hope that this Le Mans-winner’s turbo V6 might not bust today’s noise limit has just foundered.

Jean-Pierre Jaussaud is not overly bothered. He reveals that his first race was here at Goodwood in 1964 (the occasion of Jackie Stewart’s F3 debut), but a recce lap leaves him barely the wiser: “I don’t remember it being this fast.” Tooling around for photos on a lovely spring day is fine by him. Besides, he says, Michelin can no longer supply the correct tyres for the car: “It still looks beautiful, but it is not so good to drive fast now.”

the start

The start

Getty Images

Better to remember her how she was.

Beneath that long, flowing dress lay a chic French supermodel, all geared up for her biggest day. Truly, this was a match made in heaven: France’s biggest car manufacturer to take France’s biggest motor race — for the first time. A consummation. Before the national celebration, though, lay the 24-hour ceremony, the key to which was the ‘aisle’, aka ‘The Muldoon’, Les Hunaudières: 50 full seconds at 220mph.

All seemed set fair. Le Mans had seen nothing like it since Ford’s scorched-earth policy of the late Sixties. Renault’s yellow, matt black and white was overpowering in 1977; its 60-strong team swarmed the paddock. And it wasn’t just the quantity: Gérard Larrousse, François Castaing, Jean Sage, François-Xavier Delfosse, Michel Têtu, Bernard Dudot, Jean-Pierre Boudy — this was a team brimming with talent. And that’s before we get to its driver line-up: Depailler/Laffite, Jabouille/Bell, Tambay/Jaussaud and Pironi/Arnoux.

Le Mans was the only goal that year for the tested-tested-tested Renault-Alpine A442. The car had made its debut at La Sarthe the year before, setting pole and fastest lap and leading for eight laps before retiring from third with piston failure after 11 hours. But that chassis was sprint spec. No, this was Renault’s first serious attempt.

Renault’s works effort boasted huge numbers in 1978, with four cars and dozens of technical staff. Note the Perspex ‘bubble’ on cars #1 and #2

Renault’s works effort boasted huge numbers in 1978, with four cars and dozens of technical staff. Note the Perspex ‘bubble’ on cars #1 and #2

Getty Images

Two seasons of underachievement had, it was hoped, been put behind the A442 via an intensive regime: four endurance runs at Paul Ricard, and lots of max-speed running on aerodromes and along the Chambéry-Grenoble autoroute!

The team, too, was better prepared than ever before. The amalgamation of Alpine, Gordini and Renault into Renault Sport during 1976 was slowly eroding the rivalries within this Unholy Trinity: less liberté, but more egalité and fratenité. The man behind this unification was Larrousse. He had driven for Alpine at Le Mans in 1967-68 — and been unimpressed. His later, successful spells with Porsche and Matra had been much more to his liking, and he wanted to instil this same cohesion at Renault. He was indubitably thorough, but this process was not the work of a moment — as 1976 had proved.

Larrousse’s first race in charge, for instance, should have been a walkover at the Nürburgring. Instead Jean-Pierre Jabouille and Patrick Depailler, under strict instructions not to race each other, slid off on the first lap. France had a wealth of speedy talent, but appeared to be short on team players.

Forty-year-old Jean-Pierre Jaussaud knew that this was his calling card. A late starter in the sport, he’d been French F3 champion in 1970 with Tecno and the runner-up in the ’72 European F2 series at the wheel of a Brabham. The following year he finished third at Le Mans for Matra, a result he repeated in ’75 with Mirage. As the ‘Elf’ generation flourished, this moustachioed man from Caen knew he was not the apple of single-seater team managers’ eyes, and that the long-distance stuff would be his future métier. Renault Sport’s young guns had other strings to their bows, F1 and F2, and so he knew that Larrousse would need a workhorse to bear the brunt of the A442 programme…

The car of Didier Pironi and Jean-Pierre Jaussaud did without the fancy aerodynamic additions, and claimed the win by five clear laps, even if it became a punishing event for the drivers

The car of Didier Pironi and Jean-Pierre Jaussaud did without the fancy aerodynamic additions, and claimed the win by five clear laps, even if it became a punishing event for the drivers

“For a long time I was on the telephone to Larrousse persuading him to let me test the car. I knew that he had no real need of me for the race, and that this was the only possibility of me getting a drive,” says Jaussaud cheerfully. Larrousse eventually gave way. “I enjoyed all of the testing, working closely with the designers and engineers. It was an important job and I was happy to do it.”

He was even happier when he was rewarded with a place next to Patrick Tambay for the race. Sadly, their A442 would register the first of the three stunning retirements.


After four hours the squad held a comfortable 1-2-3; the nearest works Porsche was in 15th place. However, one by one, they were sidelined by the same problem: a melted piston. ‘The Muldoon’ had got ’em. Nothing, it seemed, could prepare you for it.

One month later at Silverstone, Renault made F1 history with the first appearance of its turbocharged RS01. It should have done so on a wave of euphoria: Le Mans a feel-good memory, F1 its exciting future. Instead it knew that it would have to return to La Sarthe, for Le Mans had to be won before F1 could become its priority.

All of this would’ve been dismissed as ridiculous just five years before: Renault was a motorsport minnow, as François Guiter, the go-ahead competitions boss of Elf, was about to find out. He had a problem: Matra’s Simca deal meant that Elf would have no front-line representation at Le Mans in 1972, for Simca was tied to Shell. In response he approached Renault.

the Porsche pit

The Porsche pit

Cowed by the ‘dreams of victory’ and subsequent failure of the Alpine V8s at Le Mans in 1968, Renault had washed its hands of motorsport. Thereafter it appeared content to bask in the reflected glow of Alpine’s numerous rally wins – and pretend that Matra’s racing successes weren’t happening. When Guiter proposed that it should build a racing engine for the European series for 2-litre sportscars, as a stepping-stone towards a fully-fledged Le Mans assault, he was met by careworn inertia. Undaunted, he simply handed the budget to a new generation of engineers at Gordini’s Viry-Châtillon factory and told them to get on with it. They did.

Designed by Castaing and Boudy, the 90-degree V6 CH1 produced an encouraging 270bhp and was soon dropped into the tail of Alpine’s new 1973 sportscar. Conceived by André de Cortanze, the A440 was a neat, simple, multi-tubular machine that suffered from understeer and a lack of torque and reliability. The longer, narrower A441 of 1974 was much better. With 285bhp driving through a stronger Hewland (FG400) ’box, this 575kg machine dominated the 2-litre series, scoring a championship 1-2-3 with Alain Serpaggi, Jabouille and Larrousse. It was time to step up.

“Renault’s recurring bhp problem was about to end”

That Alpine-Renault was able to do so was thanks to the foresight of colourful team boss Jean Terramorsi, and the youthful vigour of Dudot. The latter’s colleagues had thought him mad when he bolted a Garrett turbo onto one of Renault’s R16 four-pots. Even when they saw the figures this generated they still expressed doubts. In truth, these staggering numbers came hand in hand with a precipitous power curve and hideous lag – yet Jean-Luc Thérier somehow conjured a victory in the 1972 Critérium des Cévennes rally out of his all-or-nothing A110 Turbo. Terramorsi was convinced and sent Dudot to the US to learn more about turbos. Renault’s recurring bhp problem was about to come to a dramatic end.

Jabouille surveys final checks

Jabouille surveys final checks


Turbo testing began in the winter of 1974. Group 6 sports car racing had a more generous atmospheric/forced induction equivalency than Formula 1 – 1.4 compared to 2.1 – so Dudot had 2142cc to play with. Actually, he stuck with the baseline 1996cc for the first CHS engine. Even so, power shot up from 285 to 490bhp at 9900rpm and torque was almost doubled. That was on the dyno, of course; its behaviour on the track was an unknown. It was with trepidation – and without the unready A442 – that the team went to Mugello in March 1975 for round one of the World Manufacturers Championship. And it won!

This victory proved a double-edged sword, however. It raised expectations too high, too soon, which made the subsequent disappointments all the more crushing; it would remain as Renault’s only sports car win of the next two seasons. The 500bhp A442 was the fastest thing out there — but success always eluded it.

“Renault was increasing its grip on Alpine. Its yellow had replaced their blue. But the problems ran much deeper than just a coat of paint”

Despite this, the young thrusters at Renault were encouraged — and still ambitious. Among them was Bernard Hanon, the Assistant MD. He saw no reason why Renault should not succeed in motor sport — at all levels — with the implementation of a more co-ordinated competition policy. And the chance for change came at the end of 1975 when Terramorsi had to step down because of ill health. The choice of successor was stark: Jacques Cheinisse, Alpine and rallying to the core — or Larrousse. The latter proposed rigorous change, new working practices, and a general streamlining of the entire programme. He got the job.

Renault was increasing its grip on Alpine; its yellow had replaced their blue. The problems, however, went much deeper than a coat of paint. The chain of command between Renault, Alpine and Gordini was confusing, rivalries abounded, and Larrousse met with a mixed reaction: de Cortanze couldn’t work with him, but he found an ally in technical director Castaing. Two days in every week they travelled to Dieppe to oversee the A442’s build.

“It wasn’t easy for me to boss my former team-mates about,” explains Larrousse. “But there were advantages to my situation: I knew everyone’s strengths and weaknesses.” And they knew he knew. “We got a very good team out of it.” But not yet the result he so dearly wanted — and needed. Larrousse had spent a fortune in 1977 and drawn a big Le Mans blank.

Porsche’s 935 whale-tail looking resplendent

Porsche’s 935 whale-tail looking resplendent

Getty Images

Testing for the 1978 Le Mans began in the autumn of ’77 — in the USA! Mirage’s Harley Cluxton had told Larrousse of the 12km banked track at the Transport Research Centre in Ohio. This capacious facility would allow the A442 to run at top speed for all eternity — at least until it snowed! But not even acts of God could be allowed to hamper progress. Viry-Châtillon broke new ground with a test-bed that allowed both the engine and gearbox to be assessed simultaneously.

“That was our biggest step,” says Larrousse. “It was this that allowed us, just a few weeks before the race, to solve the problem with fifth gear…”

“I had a good feeling: the car was bloody quick, and very stable”

There were other late additions, too. In April, at Istres airport, Jaussaud ran a car fitted with a Perspex cockpit ‘bubble’ designed by aerodynamicist Marcel Hubert. Jaussaud was convinced the flimsy, hinged item would eventually blow off. Instead it added 10kph to the car’s top speed, albeit at the expense of a rather more claustrophobic and hot cockpit.

The biggest surprise, however, was the unveiling of the A443 just two weeks before scrutineering. An extra 3mm of bore (2138cc) and increase in boost (0.85 to 0.95 bar) gave it an extra 20bhp. This, allied to longer bodywork courtesy of an extra 16cm of wheelbase, allowed Jean-Pierre Jabouille to clock 225mph on the straight — and dispense with the disliked ‘bubble’ and underside brushes meant to create ground effect.

These developments were indicative of the fact that Renault wanted all its cars to be different; it did not want a repetition of the retirements of 1977. Which is why the second car (chassis 03) was designated A442B. This was fitted with the smaller engine, but also boasted the longer tail section; its crew decided to stick with the ‘bubble’ and brushes.

podium scenes, once Pironi had made it there

Podium scenes, once Pironi had made it there

The third car, that of Jean-Pierre Jarier and Derek Bell, was in A442 spec, i.e. no big engine, no long tail, no bubble, no brushes. Jaussaud had been originally designated to drive it, but when Tambay was sidelined because of injuries sustained at Pau, the team’s oldest driver was paired with its youngest member, 26-year-old Didier Pironi, in the A442B.

Jaussaud knew just how to play it: “I was there to fight against Porsche, not against my team-mates or my co-driver. Naturally, Didier wanted to be quicker than me. If I went quicker he would respond, so I held back so that he would do the same. He was glad to be quicker, and I was happy for him to feel that way. I had a good feeling, too: the car was bloody quick, and it was very stable.”

Jacky Ickx’s Porsche was on pole, but Stuttgart’s men hit trouble early, Ickx and Hurley Haywood pitting at the end of lap two with fuel feed problems. Worse was to follow. Ickx lost 45min while fifth(!) gear was replaced after just six hours, and so Porsche put him in its only well-placed 936. As in ’77, he charged through the night — but this time there would be no miraculous victory, more gearbox woes putting the win beyond reach.

At daybreak the A443 was holding a two-lap lead. It had been in front for 12 hours and hadn’t missed a beat. Indeed, it was running so well that Jabouille set a new lap record on lap 226… That rang Larrousse’s alarm bells. He told Dudot to reduce the boost. Thirty minutes after he had done so, the A443’s engine seized.

“Jabouille blames me for this failure,” says Larrousse. “Maybe reducing the boost did cause the problem, but we couldn’t tell for sure. I spoke with Castaing before making the call and he was in agreement.”

action at a stop

Action at a stop

Getty Images

All eyes, barring those of a tearful Jabouille, were on Pironi and Jaussaud, who were four hours from victory.

“That was a nervous time,” says Jaussaud. “I heard a cracking noise every time I pressed the clutch and changed gear. I am shorter than Didier and was worried that I wasn’t pressing the clutch far enough. I told Larrousse my fears, and when Pironi came in for the last scheduled pitstop, he asked him about it. Didier said that he was having no such problems, so they kept him in for the final stint.”

Pironi was fibbing: he was struggling with an increasingly stiff gearchange. He was dehydrated, too, his cramps so bad that he was using his left foot to accelerate. But such is the confidence of youth. Jaussaud and Larrousse admit that this decision was a mistake. How close they came to disaster was proved when Pironi collapsed while making his way up the stairs to the podium. Larrousse: “The Jaussaud/Pironi car was not my favoured one, but Pironi did some really good laps, especially at night. Jaussaud was a bit less fast, but he was quick and consistent. They worked well together.”

France rejoiced. And Renault Sport breathed a sigh of relief.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Le Mans’ closest finish – 1969

Taken from Motor Sport, June 2001


Le Mans 1969


The 1969 Le Mans 24 hours is acknowledged as one of the greatest motor races of all time, and winners Jacky Ickx and Jackie Oliver have retold their stories before. But what about the man who came second that year?

Hans Herrmann went on to win in 1970, but his place in the Vingt-Quatre Heures history books was secured by his charging performance in the race he lost by the narrowest of margins. Now a dapper 73, Herrmann acknowledges that ’69 was the more memorable experience, and his eyes light up at the recollection of his legendary battle with Ickx. After three wins for the now-outdated Ford, and with Ferrari offering only a half-hearted challenge, 1969 was going to be Porsche’s year. Racing boss Ferdinand Piëch put a mighty effort into creating the 917, and despite its troubled debut at the Nürburgring, the car was a hot favourite for Le Mans.

“Getting the 917 built was a tour de force from Piëch,” Herrmann recalls. “In the beginning the car was a catastrophe. Over time they modified it and made it better. They worked with springs, bars and dampers, because the drivers just could not get used to it. It was understeering in one corner, oversteering in the next, and in the third one was doing both at the same time!

Herrmann gives feedback in the pits, rightly or wrongly

Herrmann gives feedback in the pits, rightly or wrongly

Getty Images

“Some British engineers pointed us in the right direction; the big problem was an aerodynamic one. They went to Le Mans absolutely convinced of their power, that they would win. If the car lasted, that is.”

Through practice, the star drivers hopped from one car to the other before the final combinations were announced. Two 917s were handled by Rolf Stommelen/Kurt Ahrens and Vic Elford/Richard Attwood, while Jo Siffert preferred the sole 908 Spyder, shared with Brian Redman. A trio of standard 908s were split between the second-string drivers, with Herrmann joining French rally ace Gérard Larrousse in one of them. At 41, Hans was the old man of the team, but he was not worried about being in one of the less fancied entries.

“The 908 was an extremely light car, and very reliable, as we had so much experience with it. The older and more experienced people didn’t trust that the 917 would be able to go for 24 hours because it was still not a perfect car to drive at Le Mans — though much better than at the Nürburgring.”

The race started with tragedy when privateer John Woolfe crashed his 917 with fatal results, although Hans saw nothing of the accident. His first stint was handicapped by a set-up misjudgement.

“I made a mistake at the last qualifying. I wanted to have a little bit more downforce in the corners. Piëch said ‘No, it’s wrong’, but I won through with it — not easy against Piëch. But already on the first lap I saw that I made a mistake. I noticed immediately that I was running too low, and the body was touching the ground. I thought, ‘I will drive two or three laps and it will rub the body so much it will make the surface go, so I don’t need to come in!’ At the first stop they put it the way Piëch wanted, and it was perfect”

brake issues hampered the Porsche, but also created a breathtaking finish

Brake issues hampered the Porsche, but also created a breathtaking finish

Getty Images

Herrmann/Larrousse settled in a comfortable top-six position. And as the hours ticked away, their pace-setting team-mates began to drop out; first the Stommelen 917 with engine problems, then the Siffert Spyder with a broken gearbox. After about six hours the Herrmann car had trouble of its own.

“We stood for 30 minutes in the pits when a front wheel-bearing failed. Without that, we would have won easily. When you are that pissed off, you just go flat out and say, ‘If it breaks, it breaks.’ I was the kind of guy who was quick when he was pissed off”

“I would go through without braking. I could win it – or I could be killed”

Later Udo Schütz crashed heavily in the second-placed 908, ironically while trying to pass Larrousse. Then, around Sunday lunchtime, Elford’s leading 917 succumbed to transmission problems, which should have handed victory to the 908 of Willi Kauhsen — had that car not gone out at exactly the same time. Five cars down, Porsche’s hopes rested on Herrmann and Larrousse who were now in second, behind only the steady Ickx/Oliver GT40. At the final stops Hans got back in the 908, while Ickx stayed aboard the Ford.

“Our engine had lost a bit on revs, but we didn’t know why. Then we went into the last hour, and the front brakes were gone. We went into the pits to change the discs, then it was over, and for sure I’d be second.”

There followed a fantastic game of cat and mouse and the pair passed and repassed each other, testing their respective weaknesses. “Every lap we overtook each other three or four times. We touched very often, and each of us had the colour of the other car. But we had absolute trust in each other. One time Ickx went into the sand at Arnage, and I thought maybe he’s going to take a long time to come out and I’ll be alright, but he came out much quicker than I thought. I overtook him, but on the straight he overtook me again.

Ford speeds to the flag with Herrmann right behind

Ford speeds to the flag with Herrmann right behind

“It was strange, because neither of us wanted to go in front on the straight. We were looking at each other, and it was like a pursuit race on bicycles — you see a guy standing still, waiting for the other one to go. That was more or less what we were doing.”

On the last lap, Ickx got ahead for the crucial run through Maison Blanche. Hans had one more chance to overtake.

“For that left-right, 200 metres before the start line, I thought I will go through without braking. I could win it — or maybe I would have been killed! So I decided not to do it. It was so risky, I thought, ‘For sure I’m going to turn over on the kerbs, and then I’m gone’.”

He accepted second, just yards behind in the closest non-staged finish the race has seen. The following year he would get his revenge, scoring Porsche’s maiden Le Mans win with Richard Attwood in a 917. “When you win it’s always better. It was a big relief, a goal I had set myself— and also it was my last race. The day I went to Le Mans, my wife said, ‘Now, if you win Le Mans would you then retire?’ and just to have peace I said, ‘Okay’. And I always keep my word. I would have retired at the end of that year anyway, but I hadn’t told anybody, even my wife. But I had to organise things with Piëch, because I had a contract for the year.”

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Home hero 1980: Jean Rondeau

Taken From Motor Sport, September 2021

The story of Jean Rondeau, the last garagista to win the Le Mans 24 Hours, is a tale of grit, determination and against-the-odds endeavour that propelled the Frenchman from near-obscurity to national fame in the space of a few short years. Like Jim Glickenhaus today, he was a driven man with a big ambition — to conquer the world’s greatest endurance race.

But this son of Le Mans, who first visited his home race as a small child, didn’t set out to win the French classic as a constructor, the very feat that secured him a place in the record books as the only man to triumph in a car bearing his own name. He was instead consumed by winning the race as a driver. Building his own cars was simply a means to an end for Rondeau. And a necessary one. Rondeau wasn’t going to acquire the kind of drive necessary for him to win Le Mans based on his early exploits at the Circuit de la Sarthe. His debut in 1972 was undistinguished, save for getting hit on the helmet by a bird on the Mulsanne Straight in the open-top Chevron-Cosworth B21 in which he’d rented a seat. On his return to the big race over the following three years, he failed to qualify, finished a distant 19th and retired shortly after the halfway mark.

Rondeau was a driver of modest natural talents, and his career and his quest were, it seemed, going nowhere. The late Brian Kreisky, who brokered the deal for him to race the Chevron in 1972, remembered the Frenchman being “slow, very slow”.

national heroes

National heroes

There were a couple of seasons racing with some success in a one-make series for the Mini Innocenti backed by the French British Leyland importer, but his credentials weren’t going to propel him into a top seat at Le Mans. So Rondeau took matters into his own hands. He became a team owner and constructor.

“It wasn’t his original plan to build his own car,” says four-time Le Mans winner Henri Pescarolo, who would make six of his 33 starts in the great race driving for Rondeau’s team. “The only reason he decided to build his own car was that he knew he was never going to land a drive in a car good enough to win the race.”

When Le Mans ’76 rolled around, Rondeau was on the grid in one of two new prototypes built for the new GTP class by his own organisation. Rondeau’s fledgling team had designed and developed the Cosworth-engined machine, but the car didn’t carry his moniker. The name on the nose was Inaltéra, a manufacturer of wallpaper run by racing enthusiast Charles James.

That March he had unveiled the car at a glitzy launch in Paris and revealed an impressive driver roster boasting some of the biggest names in sports car racing from his homeland. Pescarolo, F1 grand prix winner Jean-Pierre Beltoise and Jean-Pierre Jaussaud, who had driven his first Le Mans in 1966, had all been persuaded to be part of his new adventure.

“I had a very good offer from Porsche, but Jean was very persuasive,” recalls Pescarolo. “He talked of an all-French project, and he was also offering quite a lot of money for that time.”

Rondeau was a persuasive, even charismatic man. Lucien Monte, a long-time engineer with the Rondeau operation, reckons his employees would have walked over hot coals for their boss: “He would ask a lot of everyone, but we all thought he was fantastic.”

Jean Rondeau had long dreamed of winning the world’s greatest endurance race. His victory as driver and constructor is unique

Jean Rondeau had long dreamed of winning the world’s greatest endurance race. His victory as driver and constructor is unique

That loyalty, combined with Rondeau’s drive, meant he was able to relaunch his company after two encouraging Le Mans campaigns that yielded a pair of GTP class victories and a fourth overall. James sold Inaltéra, its new owners didn’t want to continue racing, and Rondeau had to start again from scratch.

From 1978, his cars were now Rondeaus. The team could and arguably should have won Le Mans in ’79. His M379, another Cosworth-engined machine, was well-placed on Sunday morning when team-mate Jacky Haran crashed out. The winning Kremer Porsche 935 K3 would go on to spend an hour parked at the side of the Mulsanne Straight undergoing ad hoc repairs in the closing stages…

A year later, Rondeau put things right. He and Jaussaud came out on top in a battle with the Joest Racing Porsche 908/80. The Rondeau had a starter motor glitch, which is why Jaussaud stayed on slicks through a series of showers over the closing stages. Jaussaud spun on the final lap, but was able to continue to score a famous victory.

The following week, Rondeau, Jaussaud and their Rondeau M379 were feted by president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing at the Élysée Palace. A driver nicknamed ‘Bird Brain’ after his avian contretemps eight years before was now a national hero who’d left his mark on Le Mans history.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

No country for old men?

Words Rob Widdows
Taken from Motor Sport, August 2007


Pescarolo Sport had garage number one at Le Mans in 2007, pole position in one of the world’s most recognisable pitlanes. The French team enjoyed this honour thanks to its charismatic leader, a man inextricably linked to Les Vingt-Quatre Heures du Mans. Henri Pescarolo has taken part in no fewer than 33 of these races, winning on four occasions.

The first of these victories came in 1972, and so it’s no surprise that he’s keen to talk about his team-mate of that year: Matra’s surprise choice, Graham Hill. The win was the first leg of Matra-Simca’s hat-trick at La Sarthe – and completed the triple crown Hill so desired: the F1 World Championship, Indianapolis 500 and Le Mans.

Old and slow? Heck no! Graham Hill proved he’d lost none of his skill as he put in a star performance at the wheel of the Matra

Old and slow? Heck no! Graham Hill proved he’d lost none of his skill as he put in a star performance at the wheel of the Matra

“First of all, it was very strange, you know,” Pescarolo says in those deliberate tones, serious face under peaked cap, “because I did not want to drive for Matra. I was very upset with them because they had pushed me out of the F1 team in 1970, even though I’d had fantastic results. It was my first full year in Formula 1, and the car was not so competitive, yet I was third at Monaco [he was also fifth in France and sixth in Belgium and Germany]. So when they asked Chris Amon to join for 1971, it was very frustrating for me. I decided never again to race for Matra.

“Two years later Jabby Crombac came to tell me that Matra wanted me to drive for them at Le Mans. I told him no. But in the end I agreed to do it. I saw it was the right team and the right car, and that there was a chance to win.”

But there was another sticking point.

Matra’s biggest opposition came from Porsche’s 907, but the winning MS670 finished 19 laps clear of the best German car

Matra’s biggest opposition came from Porsche’s 907, but the winning MS670 finished 19 laps clear of the best German car

Getty Images

“I was so surprised,” admits Pesca, “when they told me I would be driving with Graham Hill. At first I said, ‘No, I don’t want him.’ I was concerned about how he would cope with the conditions, the dangers. Le Mans is so different from F1. It’s a road race, the most dangerous race at that time. I said, ‘What if it’s raining in the night, or there’s fog in the morning, do you think he will be prepared to take risks?’”

Pescarolo’s initial worries were understandable. Although Hill had plenty of experience of Le Mans – he numbered Stirling Moss, Richie Ginther and Jackie Stewart among his previous co-drivers there, and had finished second in 1964 alongside Jo Bonnier in Maranello Concessionaires’ Ferrari 330P – he hadn’t started this enduro event since 1966, and, at 43, his powers appeared to be waning.

“I was still a young driver,” says Pescarolo. “Graham Hill was a legend. I had never even spoken to him. That would have been impossible for me. But eventually I said, ‘Okay, I will drive with him.’

Hill and Pescarolo celebrate

Hill and Pescarolo celebrate

Getty Images

“And so he came to the team, became my team-mate –and in a very short time a real friend too. It was strange. It was as if it had always been like that. It was so easy from the first contact. He was such a fantastic guy. And he was bloody quick of course.” In all conditions, too. “When I looked at his lap times during the night, and in the rain, I thought, ‘Okay, I can sleep now.’ His speed in the night was one of the reasons we won.

“We were also very good together as a team. That helped. We spent the week before the race together, staying in the same château, and it was a fantastic time for me.”

Pescarolo had admired Hill from a distance. Now he had a close-up of the Englishman’s famed determination: “I think he realised this was his last chance to win the race. And although he was teamed with drivers much younger than himself, he was ready to listen, to learn. I told him things you must watch out for in this race, things that can go wrong. But he had huge experience, too. He was soon on the pace.

Hill’s pace through the night was a key factor

Hill’s pace through the night was a key factor

Getty Images

“A lot of teams have had problems because one of the drivers wants to prove he is the faster. This leads to many mistakes. But that never happened with Graham. He was intelligent and had the right approach. We both had: if I was quick he was pleased; if he was quick I was pleased. He knew it was important not to have your team-mate as your enemy. Not all F1 drivers, especially world champions, have understood that.

“We beat the other Matras with their F1 drivers – François Cevert, Jean-Pierre Beltoise – because we drove as a team. It was the same with Gérard Larrousse and me in the two years after. But with Graham it was something very, very special. I was so pleased for him because that was his big target: to win Le Mans.”

“There was an explosion of joy after the race. Right through the night, with champagne. Then the whole team went to lunch with President Pompidou at the Élysée Palace. Incredible”

Interviewed after the race, Hill was equally generous in praise of his team-mate – and team: “The rivalry between the Matra drivers was intense. We all wanted to win. My car was still pulling the same revs down the Mulsanne Straight at the end of the race as it had at the start. A fantastic car – and the best team I’ve ever driven for at Le Mans.

“I cannot praise Henri Pescarolo highly enough. We shared the four-hour stints throughout the race, but it was Henri who actually drove across the line, which was only right as it was the first French win for over 20 years.”

The French had gone winless at their most famous race since the Rosiers’ 1950 victory in a Talbot-Lago.

Pescarolo leading the sister car of François Cevert/Howden Ganley

Pescarolo leading the sister car of François Cevert/Howden Ganley

Getty Images

“There was an explosion of joy after the race,” remembers Pescarolo. “Right through the night, with champagne at a big Moët et Chandon party. Then the whole team went to lunch with President Pompidou at the Élysée Palace. Incredible.

“Matra had been trying to win at Le Mans for so long and now they had their first victory. It was absolutely fabulous for them and for me also. Everybody was calling us the Matraciens, meaning ‘the men of Matra’. We had been really ready to kill ourselves for the team.”

And 43-year-old Graham Hill, a very English Englishman in a very French team at the most French of races, had matched them all the way.

“He was perfect,” smiles Pesca.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

“He’s no braggart, Ron Gaudion”

Taken from Motor Sport, April 2018


He’s no braggart, Ron Gaudion. If you had been team mechanic on Jaguar D-types for all three Le Mans victories you might expect to revel in the glory at least a little. But having been a crucial part of the Coventry marque’s hat-trick, Ron returned to his native Australia, went into the oil industry – “and it just never came up for 15 years”.

Things have changed. Those racing days have become not just rose-tinted but gold-plated and Ron’s memories are valued. Sixty years on from the last of those momentous races, Ron returned to the UK courtesy of BA to celebrate that 4pm moment in 1957 when his team, privateer Ecurie Ecosse, took a momentous 1-2 at La Sarthe. He was a central part of a recent D-type celebration event, when the three Ds which came first, second and third along with the prototype long-nose and Jaguar’s Heritage car combined for a road trip like no other. Before that, though, I had a chance to reminisce over lunch with him about building Ds, Ecurie Ecosse, and how a young man lucked into a glorious moment of British racing history.

FAND0471

“I didn’t aim to go racing,” he says, an upright, fit, friendly figure of 87 who proves to have pin-sharp recall. “I just wanted automotive experience.” That led him to Coventry, Britain’s motoring heart, early in 1955 where he tried all the firms but despite having seven years’ training under his belt there were no openings – until Jaguar remembered it needed 20 men for an experimental project, a new racing sports car.

“I was shown some blueprints stuck up on the wall and Malcolm Sayer’s sketch of the car. ‘We’re going to build 100 of those,’ they said.”

Ron’s job was to help assemble the first 10 subframes and produce patterns for the ‘production’ cars. He couldn’t know that five of those first 10 would become legendary race-winning machines – the long-nose D-types that would bring lasting glory to the British marque.

Nor did he know as he helped wheel the selected racers to the next-door competition department workshops to be prepared for Silverstone, Le Mans and Reims, that the works team needed a temporary extra bod for the 24-hour classic – and he would be it. It would furnish the young Victorian with experiences no-one could forget. “Pulling on those overalls with the Jaguar symbol on, I felt 10ft tall.”

That Le Mans race of 1955 did bring victory for Jaguar’s sleek new car, Mike Hawthorn and Ivor Bueb taking the flag on that quiet Sunday afternoon, but it did so against a background of anguish and devastation such as motor racing had not before known. The images of racing’s worst crash, which happened directly in front of him, still greatly affect Ron, colouring what had earlier been “two and a half hours of the best sports car racing I’ve ever seen. First Fangio [in the Mercedes 300SLR] was in front, then Mike. That’s why there were so many people in the stands – they were keen to see the first pitstops.”

The Jaguar D-type of Ivor Bueb and Ron Flockhart on its way to victory at Le Mans in 1957. Ecurie Ecosse was at the height of its powers, finishing one-two in the Jaguar factory’s team’s absence

The Jaguar D-type of Ivor Bueb and Ron Flockhart on its way to victory at Le Mans in 1957. Ecurie Ecosse was at the height of its powers, finishing one-two in the Jaguar factory’s team’s absence

Getty Images

I don’t want to keep Ron on the subject of the human distress he saw, but I ask what it did to Hawthorn, who was the unwitting centre of the accident.

“Because of the smash Mike had to go round again, and as we waited Ivor said ‘I’m not getting in’. We’d all seen two blokes killed right in front of us. Lofty said to him, ‘just get in and drive. Don’t race, just keep it going’. He got in and he was back to speed in five laps.”

Lofty, meanwhile, was trying to protect Hawthorn from the unfolding facts. “He said ‘keep away from Mike, don’t tell him anything’. But around 2am someone gave him a newspaper and it really shook him.”

It’ll be debated to the end of time whether or not Jaguar’s discs would have outlasted Mercedes’ drum and air brakes, but after Stuttgart decreed a team withdrawal Hawthorn and Bueb’s victory was virtually assured. The team returned to Coventry with the laurels, but the bloom was off the leaves.

And Ron was back on assembling D-types. He wasn’t needed for the Reims 12 Hours, the only other race on the works calendar, and there was no guarantee of a team place next season, so he determined to follow the Ds to a privateer outfit favoured by Lofty England and the Jaguar management – Ecurie Ecosse. With success in XK140s and C-types, the Scottish outfit was becoming a Browns Lane second XI, and with a brace of Ds on order Ron knew they’d need another hand.

“Jaguar only did two or three races per season, but I knew Ecosse were very active. So when Wilkie Wilkinson came down to collect two Ds from the works I introduced myself. He told me to come to Aintree to meet David Murray, who offered me the job, at £8 10s a week – a tenner less than Jaguar! But EE offered more racing, so after pushing it to £10 I went.”

What Murray’s team achieved on its tight budget was remarkable. Working from a couple of cramped mews garages in Edinburgh, the tiny outfit – Ron, his good mate Stan Sproat, head mechanic Wilkie Wilkinson, Pat Meehan and Sandy Arthur the transport man – carted their blue Jaguars from Edinburgh to Le Mans, to Monza and even Sweden, bringing back an improbable haul of results.


 

Ah yes, Wilkie. Dapper frontman for Murray’s team, always beaming, always in the photo, always mentioned in reports. Brooklands tuning wizard with Bellevue MGs and ERAs, central to setting up EE in 1951, the ace tuner who oversaw the team’s success. I recall how impressed I was to meet him in the 1980s, still beaming, still famous.

Ron isn’t an unkind man. It takes a while to unroll his opinion. “I can honestly say the few times I saw him lay a spanner on a car he ballsed it up, excuse my language. We were trying out drivers at the Nürburgring and Dickie Stoop came in to change plugs. Wilkie says ‘I’ll do this’. Afterwards I missed my plug spanner. I checked with Stan and DM and said ‘it’s in that car.’”

This isn’t about tidiness; a loose spanner in a racing car could jam a throttle, kill a driver. “144 corners – I thought, this guy’s dead. He came back in and DM says I’ll keep Dickie occupied, you check under the bonnet. D’you know, that spanner was sandwiched between airbox and bonnet, didn’t move at all. Up, down, 14½ miles… I get goose-bumps even telling you about it.”

Sanderson tidily guides his D towards second place at Le Mans, 1957, before it went straight to Monza for the Race of Two Worlds, right

Sanderson tidily guides his D towards second place at Le Mans, 1957, before it went straight to Monza for the Race of Two Worlds

Getty Images

Strangely, Murray was always Wilkie’s best promoter, despite the evidence. There was even a 1957 story claiming the two had tested a LM car around local French roads. “A fib,” Ron says firmly. “DM was always exaggerating Wilkie’s achievements. I followed the three works cars down, peeled off to our hotel and drove straight into the transporter, and we locked the transporter until the car went to scrutineering next day.”

DM wasn’t totally blind to Stan and Ron’s views. “I remember him pointing to a carb pipe and saying what’s that, Ron? A breather. Stan says, he asked me the same thing. Wilkie told him it was a fuel feed pipe! He was checking out Wilkie.”

But fair’s fair: “He was good at tuning SUs – he got the 120s and C-types going really well, but on Webers he was way off”.

Murray never had a cross word for Ron or Stan, but after the ’Ring episode he let fly at Wilkie. “Same in Sweden at the 1957 1000km,” Ron recalls, a twinkle in his eye. “We took the cars that had finished 1-2 at Le Mans, and at the first pitstop we’re waiting and Wilkie looks at all these photographers and news cameras and says ‘I’ll do this one’. The routine was you stand in front of the car holding the dipper, a big pot of oil for top ups. What does Wilkie do? Goes out far too soon, his arm gets tired and he puts down the dipper. Sanderson arrives, Wikie steps back, puts one foot in the dipper. He’s jumping around – ” Ron jumps up grinning to demonstrate – “there’s a gallon of oil everywhere, we’re laughing fit to burst… Mr Bean couldn’t have done it better! But DM went mad, tore into Wilkie. ‘Leave it to the boys in future!’

“I caught up with Graham Hill in the 1961 Sandown Tasman tour, when Wilkie was at BRM and asked him how he was doing. Boy, did he pay out! ‘You mean the storeman,’ he says. They’d put him in charge of spares.”


However, Wilkie didn’t generally interfere with Stan and Ron’s work, and 1956 saw the team take its first D to Le Mans. With three works cars, two Aston Martins – featuring Stirling Moss and Peter Collins, no less – and scads of Ferraris and Maseratis, the saltired Scots were not expecting an easy run with their two-year-old car, tiny team and aged transport: at this point, says Ron, one vehicle was a 1928 Leyland and the other a cut-down 1936 double-decker. And you’d be lucky to scrape 45mph in either. Yet against such odds Flockhart and Sanderson’s singleton D thrived as crashes and breakages knocked out the opposition – a remarkable debut triumph. “Boy, did we celebrate!” says Ron. “We were delighted to beat Moss and Collins in the Aston. But the biggest high was at Le Mans in ’57.”

“Think of Ron and the lads carting the cars to the Monzanapolis event in those aged trucks. It took days”

Let’s not repeat the tale of Jaguar’s 1-2-3-4-6, headed by the two Ecosse D-types. Let the cheering die down and instead think of Ron, Stan and Sandy immediately carting the successful cars down to Italy for the Monzanapolis event in those aged trucks. It took days, says Ron. “And we’d already been down there for the Mille Miglia in May. We got up the Mont Cenis pass to find it snow-blocked, so we turned round and drove via Nice. With all the first-gear work the red-hot exhaust burned through a fuel line, which I fixed with a plastic shirt wrapping. Lasted the three days back to Edinburgh!”

the Race of Two Worlds

The Race of Two Worlds

Getty Images

A contrast with Ron’s drive down to that ’57 Le Mans race – in the future winner. With no illusions about Wilkie, Lofty England held the new fuel-injected car at the works so he wouldn’t mess with it. Thus Ron had to drive it from Coventry to Le Mans, via Bristol air freighters to Cherbourg. “We took the four privately entered cars – the Duncan Hamilton car, the French, the Belgian [which would place third and fourth] and our car – and Lofty told me ‘just follow the others’. He kept off the main roads but these are country lanes; I got caught behind a tractor so I’m putt-putting along in this racer at 20mph. Then I had to catch up – probably the best drive I’ve ever had, catching the team in a Le Mans Jaguar.”

Murray was a fine manager who spread a small budget a long way, and Ron’s programme especially suited him. “We prepared the cars by October for the next season and then I had winter off and signed on as a ship’s engineer. At the end I’d return to Edinburgh. DM was very happy because he saved several months’ salary. He was running on a shoestring.”

Did it feel like that? “No. Our wages were always in, we got regular expenses, we had the best cars. He was tight with money, yet when he loaned me cash when I ran short abroad he usually denied it when I tried to pay it back.”

On the other hand, while Jaguar gave him a £25 bonus for the ’55 win, Ron had to go to DM’s panelled office over the mews and request his portion of the prize money. It was no palace, that cramped mews base: “Virtually horse stalls, just room for a car and a bench. Any minor nudges went to the local dealer to fix, but if it was serious it went back to the works.” Which, he says, negates the story that there was a spare frame or body parts found there. “There was no room!”

A chartered accountant by trade, Murray was balancing several business interests: he had two hotels and some wine shops. Eventually he left the UK in a hurry, leaving behind rumours of financial and sexual improprieties, and never returned. But as a team owner he seems to have been ideal: the crew always had what they needed, he was a man of extreme thoroughness, and as an ex-racer himself he knew what counted. He’d prepare a campaign plan for each trip, with timings, writing out yellow slips with the details.

I ask if they disassembled and rebuilt the new cars. “No. We trusted Lofty. After three races we’d take the heads off and check valves and tappets in case of over-revving but we never had trouble with the mains or lower end. Everything had to be wirelocked, split-pinned or tabbed. It’s all in the prep if you have the right car and a driver who’ll do what he’s told.”


Murray had pre-race rules – no beer or romantic interludes for three days prior, the latter often broken by Ninian Sanderson. Ron reflects on their drivers: “Jock Lawrence was pretty good and Flockhart was excellent, no1 for sure. But Ninian was always up to japes. Once in ’56 when Ron had just joined us he was getting in the car and Ninian stuck a firecracker up the exhaust. Flockhart turned the key – BANG! He leaped out like a jack rabbit. Ninian laughed like a drain – but Ron went out and beat him by 1.5 seconds…”

Ron Flockhart steers the winning car through the Le Mans crowds – with Wilkie centre-stage, as usual

Ron Flockhart steers the winning car through the Le Mans crowds – with Wilkie centre-stage, as usual

Getty Image

He has good words for Hawthorn too: “If a schoolboy came up he’d always stop and talk”.

In 1962 Flockhart died in an air crash, one of many funerals. “In my ’55-58 run 12 drivers were killed,” Gaudion reflects.

And he has an insight into one in particular. “On the Mille Miglia I was at the Bologna pitstop when de Portago came in. He’d obviously hit kerbs and bent the Borrani spoked wheels – the whole car was shaking – but he over-ruled the pit manager who tried to replace the rims. Taruffi was only 2.5 minutes ahead and he wanted to catch him. They could have changed the wheels but he just took fuel and at 150 or so a wheel let go. The usual story is a tyre, but I know what caused that accident.”

Murray expected Gaudion to continue in 1958 – Ron still has the unworn overalls he was issued – but he could see that both Ecosse and the D had peaked. With his new wife, May, he returned to Australia and became commercial and racing manager for BP oils. Few knew of his time in the limelight. It was a brief excursion – but perfect timing.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Mazda 787B: de-fanging the Jaguars 

Taken from Motor Sport, June 2001


The finish of Le Mans is always a great occasion, but this one is special. The little green and orange Mazda has humiliated the mighty SauberMercedes and Jaguar teams, not to mention ambitious newcomer Peugeot. Until now, Mazda has been a bit player at La Sarthe, getting more attention for the car-busting noise of its rotary engines than for any achievements on the track.

You heard it before you saw it. The Mazda 787B will go down in history as the first Japanese car to win Le Mans

You heard it before you saw it. The Mazda 787B will go down in history as the first Japanese car to win Le Mans

As the clock finally passes 4pm, Mazdaspeed boss Takayoshi Ohashi appears to be shell-shocked. A distinguished man who resembles a veteran actor, he has loyally supported Le Mans for nearly two decades. He’s always given the impression that he enjoyed the Olympian ideal of just turning up. Now he’s done the impossible, and there are team celebrations and hugs aplenty.

Herbert with Gachot

Herbert with Gachot

Back in Tokyo, executives from Nissan and Toyota shake their heads in disbelief as they watch TV pictures of jubilation on the pitwall. Little Mazda has done what they have failed to do despite years of trying. Now they can only be the second Japanese marque to win Le Mans.

Drained spectators go crazy as Johnny Herbert completes his victory lap. Or rather, fails to complete it, as he is waved into parc ferme just before the Ford Chicane, and is thus denied the chance to take the chequered flag and enjoy a final run past the pits. TV cameras lose track of him, so few know that Johnny is completely shattered after two hours at the wheel. He gets out of the car, is greeted by his delighted father Bob, and promptly collapses onto the sidepod. He’s dehydrated and exhausted after a long final stint; a plate of dodgy spaghetti bolognese a few hours ago did him no good.

It’s been quite a race. This is not a hollow victory; the Mazda beat a trio of healthy Jaguars in terms of pace, and was in the right place to benefit when the Silver Arrows hit a string of problems. Two of the cars retire, while the third trails home fifth. Mazda has the reliability that the German cars were lacking, but it’s also had the pace to outrun everyone except the Mercs. So why have the underdogs suddenly become the stars? A favourable weight limit has certainly helped. The Jags and Porsches had to run a full 170kgs heavier than the Mazdas, and it showed. Andy Wallace, a rookie winner just three years ago, has to settle for fourth.

Herbert with his Mazdaspeed engineer

Herbert with his Mazdaspeed engineer

“Basically the car is just too heavy,” he shrugs, “too heavy to handle and too heavy to pull out of the slow corners. Getting through the Dunlop Chicane is a real struggle. Every time I do it I’m surprised to come out the other side. We chose the right set-up, but need more speed.”

“The effort we all put into driving in that race… it was like  a grand prix”

It’s not just down to the opposition’s problems, as Mazda’s preparation has also been superb. The signs were there last year, when designer Nigel Stroud upgraded to a composite tub, and a punchy four-rotor engine was introduced. The team also backed up its regular squad of drivers with three single-seater hotshots, who were under orders to thrash the thing to bits.

Herbert, Bertrand Gachot and Volker Weidler did exactly that, and 12 months on, Mazda has made improvements, adding carbon brakes to the package. The same three drivers returned, and their charging style has made the difference between winning and losing.

Jaguar was heavily fancied with a full compliment of five works cars. They would finish second-fourth

Jaguar was heavily fancied with a full compliment of five works cars. They would finish second-fourth

Getty Images

Ohashi is congratulated by Tom Walkinshaw. The Scot has a lot of respect for his Japanese colleague; a few years ago, TWR made its first steps in sportscar racing in partnership with Mazdaspeed, and both have come a long way.

Weidler and Gachot are pushed by the mob down to the new podium, part of the ultra modern pit complex. There’s no sign of Johnny, and word comes through that he is having medical treatment. Celebrations continue, the Mazda pair flanked by two sets of bemused Jaguar drivers.

It’s a sweet moment for the winners. Gachot’s career is on the up; he’s just scored points for the new Jordan team at the Canadian GP. He didn’t enjoy Le Mans last year, but as this race has progressed, his motivation has increased.

Peugeot made its Le Mans bow but neither 905 would finish

Peugeot made its Le Mans bow but neither 905 would finish

Few notice, unless they’ve studied lap times, but Weidler has been the anchorman. A disastrous year in F1 trying to pre-qualify the Rial appeared to finish him off, but he’s fighting back in Japanese F3000. Mazda’s top brass enjoy their podium moment, and finally the national anthems and champagne spraying are over. The winning drivers enter the 24H press room for a light-hearted Q&A with the media, but there’s still no sign of Johnny. When proceedings break up, I doorstep Gachot. Was he surprised to win?

“It was a surprise for us to have been so competitive all through the race,” he admits. “But the Mazda people believed we had something special this year. We never lost hope. Also, in testing everything went well. The car was extremely good. Nigel designed a fantastic car, the team ran perfectly and we had no problems, no hiccups. The engine was extremely reliable and very good on fuel, and the other drivers did a good job, they were fantastic. I tell you, we were pushing all through the race, 100 per cent.

Herbert with his Mazdaspeed

Herbert with his Mazdaspeed engineer

Getty Images

“I believe that if you are a young guy, and you go hard at it for 24 hours, you can make a good result. Normally, sports car racing doesn’t ask for the last tenth, but I think it’s changed. We were giving our very best. Let’s say the effort I put into driving, Johnny put into driving, and Volker put into driving, was like in a GP. Look at Johnny — he’s in hospital now because of collapsing.”

The stops have also been remarkably efficient. A couple of new noses didn’t cost much time, and the only delay came with scheduled attention to the brakes.

“We had to change the front discs only once. This was the big improvement from last year. The car has been improved in lots of details, so this was probably our best chance, and they knew it from the start.”

Out in the paddock, mechanics are busy packing up, and drivers are rapidly disappearing. There’s one man I must find, and I finally track him down in a caravan in the Mazda encampment.

Consistency paved the way for the win

Consistency paved the way for the win

Getty Images

Ohashi-san speaks English well, but the emotion has knocked him for six; his loyal secretary translates his thoughts.

“We aimed for it, but we couldn’t believe the victory,” she says.

“Not expected!”, Ohashi chimes in.

With the rotary outlawed from next year, was he determined to win on what was destined to be Mazda’s last appearance?

Jaguar’s best XJR-12LM would finish two laps shy

Jaguar’s best XJR-12LM would finish two laps shy

Getty Images

“In fact, the situation was that it was the last race for the rotary, but he tried not to think about that, because he didn’t want to get any tension from that.”

He’s cagey on the subject of the weight limit that has clearly helped so much.

“If this year’s cars weighed 50kg more, our brakes would be more stressed.”

“It was due to be the last race for the Rotary, but we tried not to think about that”

I offer him my congratulations again, and head for the Moët et Chandon compound, where teams traditionally celebrate victory. There, I bump into Johnny. It’s good to see he’s up and about, but he’s not sounding healthy. Still in a bit of a daze, he signs a few autographs on the way in.

His colleagues are already there, along with the crews of the other Mazdas, which finished sixth and eighth.

the podium, sans Johnny after his post-race collapse

The podium, sans Johnny after his post-race collapse

Getty Images

There’s a good crowd of team insiders; loyal Mazda veterans Pierre Dieudonne, Maurizio Sandra Sala and David Kennedy say they would have loved to have been in the winning car, but they know the winners reached a level that they could not have sustained for 24 hours.

Johnny is still zonked, and after the speeches he’s taken to a quiet, dark room for some further rest. The effort of the previous day and night has really caught up with him, but I take my chance and grab him. His voice is hoarse, his words slow.

Few fancied Mazda against the Jaguars and Mercedes, but lighter weight and the sheer determination of its drivers made the difference

Few fancied Mazda against the Jaguars and Mercedes, but lighter weight and the sheer determination of its drivers made the difference

Getty Images

“No one was pushing us, and the Jags were probably hoping we were going to break down. Driving was not really a problem, but I’d been feeling a little bit funny in the stomach. It was just when I got out of the car that I felt really bad.”

It’s yet to sink in that this is the greatest moment of his career to date. It comes just a few weeks after his return from exile in Japan to a seat with the Lotus F1 team.

“I don’t normally get excited anyway. But I’m happy just from the point of view of my feet; I’m really happy they went the whole way through and I just had no problem whatsoever. I’m sure people are still going to say things, but I’ve got that for the rest of my life. But as far as I’m concerned, it’s all behind me now.” In four days he will be in the F1 car in testing at Silverstone, and he’ll win another personal battle — he’ll be quicker than team-mate Mika Häkkinen.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

The beast from the east: Nissan R89C

Taken from Motor Sport, January 2022


At the end of a year in which Honda of Japan had shone so brightly in Formula 1, let’s spool back some 30 years to the Group C World Sportscar Championship contender fielded then by rival major Japanese manufacturer, Nissan.

The name Nissan is derived from Nihon Sangyo, meaning somewhat disappointingly just ‘Japan industry’. Before World War 2 the Nissan Group absorbed DAT, making motor cars under the Datsun brand.

The all-black test car

The all-black test car

Nissan

The wider Group’s wartime activities in support of the Japanese military left it with a tainted image, and so its cars were marketed under the Datsun brand name until a rather more forward-thinking management decreed resurrection of the Nissan title across global export markets from 1981. That growth in Japanese industrial confidence and ambition into the 1980s helped the nation’s three major motor manufacturers, Mazda, Toyota and Nissan, follow Honda’s lead in recognising the promotional possibilities attached to top-level racing. The industry had become world leaders in producing reliable, dependable passenger cars – but most were, in essence, pretty grey porridge.

Around the same time that competitive stirrings were afflicting the loins of high-ranking Japanese motor industry executives, the FIA had introduced its fuel consumption-conscious Group C endurance racing category, contesting the revived World Sportscar Championship (widely known as the WSC).

Nissan supplied engines to private teams contesting Japanese national championship races in 1982-84. In 1983 Hoshino Racing bought a March 83G chassis to carry Nissan’s developing four-cylinder turbocharged engine. Meanwhile, in the USA, long-time Datsun SCCA racing exponent Don Devendorf’s Electramotive had in-house engineer John Knepp develop a 3-litre Nissan V6 ZX production engine for both IMSA and Group C racing. The IMSA unit retained an iron stock block while for Group C a 60-degree V6 aluminium block was created. With twin turbochargers it was capable of producing around 1000bhp.

in the pits at the Le Mans 24 Hours in 1989

In the pits at the Le Mans 24 Hours in 1989

Nissan in Japan had founded Nismo (Nissan Motorsports) directed by Yasuharu Namba to race works cars between 1984 and a maiden entry in the WSC at Fuji in 1985. Three new March 85G chassis were acquired, two carrying the new alloy engine, and it was this pair of 3-litre March-Nissans which appeared in that race. Drivers Kazuyoshi Hoshino and Masahiro Hasemi set the fastest two times in first practice before the two works Rothmans Porsches took a grip. Apparently divine intervention then caused the Fuji circuit to be rocked by earthquakes and a monsoon rainstorm. The European teams deemed conditions too unsafe on their Goodyear and Dunlop tyres and withdrew pre-race, leaving the Bridgestone-shod March-Nissans to win for Nismo, Hoshino lapping the entire field.

Four new March 86Gs were bought for 1986, Nismo running three of them with the V6 turbo engine. One works car and an older 85G were entered for Le Mans that year and experienced British team manager Keith Greene was hired to direct operations. Sadly this pilot Nissan Le Mans operation proved farcical, with a cultural clash between the Japanese driver/management faction and its British counterparts. The 86G broke its crankshaft after six hours, and the 85G limped home only 16th.

Nissan then built a new 3-litre 90-degree V8 engine for 1987, tailored to Group C in new March 87G chassis. Other than an entertaining proclivity towards igniting their cars during refuelling – a Jaguar mechanic remarking “Aah, they must be full now” as a Nissan mechanic flailed past with his overalls alight – the Japanese marque flopped again at Le Mans.

For 1988 the VEJ30 engine was abandoned, and specialist Yoshimasa Hayashi designed a fresh 3-litre, using the same 90-degree V8 layout and 66mm stroke to retain the same crankshaft. At Le Mans both cars’ engines failed almost simultaneously.

Cabin-liveried R89C in the 1990 Suzuka WSC round

Cabin-liveried R89C in the 1990 Suzuka WSC round

Nissan’s management still coveted Le Mans success. Group C regulations for 1989-90 initially decreed that any manufacturer wishing to compete at Le Mans also had to contest the WSC. Nissan approached Lola for all-new composite-chassised cars, the first becoming the Nissan R89C. Two completely separate racing operations were launched – both to use a new 3.5-litre VHR35 V8 engine with 77mm stroke crank. Nissan Motorsports Europe (NME) was based in Milton Keynes, run by Howard Marsden and Keith Greene, to concentrate upon the European FIA events. Nismo Japan contested the Japanese Championship and ran alongside NME in the Japanese WSC round re-homed at Suzuka.

At last Nissan had a sensible race programme, well engineered and well run, and although the R89/90Cs struggled with reliability through their first season, in 1990 Nissan would finish third in the FIA Teams’ Championship – but without a race win.

French team Courage ran an R89C at Le Mans 1990 with Hervé Regout, Costas Los and Alain Cudini driving, finishing down the field in 22nd

French team Courage ran an R89C at Le Mans 1990 with Hervé Regout, Costas Los and Alain Cudini driving, finishing down the field in 22nd

For 1991 Nissan closed the NME arm and concentrated its support on Devendorf’s Nissan Performance Technology Inc (NPTI) team in America – running both in-house-built NPT90/91 chassis and the R90C composite cars in the US IMSA Championship series. Nissan sorely wanted to return to Le Mans, but in response to rival-team protests against it doing so on a one-off guest-entry basis – ignoring other WSC rounds – the FIA refused.

So the 1991 Le Mans 24 Hours was run without Nissan entries – and Mazdaspeed scored the Japanese industry’s first win there. The fact that the ear-splitting little Wankel-engined Mazda pulled off that coup on a budget of barely £400,000 against the millions invested by Nissan simply added to the humiliation.

“The turbo kicked in and I nearly wiped out a bystander – the Lola boss”

Julian Bailey was one of Nissan’s 1989-90 team drivers, but recalls how “It could have begun really badly, because the first time I drove it in bare unbodied form in the car park at Lola’s, the turbo kicked in, took me by surprise, and I nearly wiped out a bystander – Eric Broadley, the Lola boss.

“They were a nice team to drive for, a great atmosphere, though we had a few issues with the car – especially that first year, ’89. The engine was fantastic, vast power, too much in fact for our cross-ply Dunlop tyres. One big change was to fit radials at the rear, cross-plies on the front, and that at last allowed us to cut wheelspin and put the power down. Compared to those Group C cars, F1 was easy.”

Nissan team manager Keith Greene – who passed away in 2022 – in conversation with Julian Bailey at Dijon-Prenois in 1989

Nissan team manager Keith Greene – who passed away in 2022 – in conversation with Julian Bailey at Dijon-Prenois in 1989

Getty Images

Through 1989 the new Lola-chassised R89Cs – four of which were built – proved very fast in a straight line but difficult to set up, and dogged by initially poor brakes until a change was made to carbon discs. The cars also had a habit of popping out their windscreen panels.

“I was the only one to take the Mulsanne kink absolutely flat, at 248mph”

The 1989 opening championship round at Suzuka featured Toshio Suzuki/Kazuyoshi Hoshino finishing fourth in Nismo’s March-Nissan R88C. Round 2 at Dijon-Prenois then had Julian Bailey/Mark Blundell finding their feet in endurance racing with their R89C, qualifying sixth – and at Le Mans, as Julian Bailey recalls: “The car’s aero worked really well; we had telemetry and I was the only one to take the Mulsanne kink absolutely flat, at 248mph… Scary! But the car gave some confidence apart from the brakes, a soft pedal at the end of the straight, and I punted Nielsen’s Jaguar up the back when the pedal just hit the stops, and then I locked up the rears. We had to pump the brakes with the left foot, and on that lap I just hadn’t. The team weren’t very happy.”

A first finish came at Jarama, Spain, Bailey/Blundell eighth, and at the Nürburgring team-mate Andrew Gilbert-Scott wrested the race lead from the normally dominant Saubers and ended his stint 30 seconds in the lead. Unfortunately the Nissan was running well over its fuel allowance and was forced to slow and fall back, finally running dry with three laps remaining. Then came the Donington Park round. Julian Bailey: “The Saubers had a bigger low-revving engine, more torque, and they just pulled away – but Mark Blundell and I led for a while before a tyre problem and we finished third there and I set fastest lap.”

At fast and fuel-thirsty Spa, NME opted for an economy chip in the R89C’s engine but Bailey/Blundell again placed third while they finished 12th in the final round in Mexico City.

Mark Blundell and Julian Bailey (in the car) were co-drivers in five of eight rounds in 1989’s WSC, with two podium finishes

Mark Blundell and Julian Bailey (in the car) were co-drivers in five of eight rounds in 1989’s WSC, with two podium finishes

Getty Images

Into 1990, Keith Greene was ousted from NME, being replaced by Dave Price and Bob Bell from Sauber. The team ran two cars with much the same V8 engine in an updated R90C version of the Lola chassis. Kenny Acheson and Gianfranco Brancatelli took the second car with Martin Donnelly and Raul Boesel as occasional team-mates, while Bailey/Blundell retained the lead car.

Nismo Japan entered an R89C in the year’s opening round at Suzuka, Anders Olofsson/Masahiro Hasemi finishing third while thereafter NME flew Nissan’s banner. Fortunes had improved but like Jaguar they could only pick up crumbs from the Mercedes-Benz banquet. Wheel nuts fell off at Monza and Silverstone, but the now reliable V8 engine retained its fuel-thirstiness – having to finish most races with the boost wound right back.

For Le Mans 1990, Nissan’s effort was huge – running five cars, two R90Cs from NME, two prepared by US-based NPTI and one from Japan. Two semi-works R89Cs also appeared, one from Team Le Mans, the other from Yves Courage. Nissan logos appeared everywhere at La Sarthe, 21 drivers employed. Blundell qualified on pole using a ‘super-bomb’ engine which he thought “had its turbo waste-gate jam open”. Bailey/Blundell/Brancatelli led on Saturday evening until the latter smashed into Suzuki’s Toyota entering the Dunlop Curve. Brabham/Robinson/Daly in the NPTI car challenged for the lead before a fuel leak ruined them.

In other championship rounds, Bailey/Acheson finished seventh at Monza, third at Spa; Bailey/Blundell third at Dijon. At the Nürburgring Blundell drove solo to finish fifth, Brancatelli/Acheson ninth. Brancatelli/Acheson and Bailey/Blundell finished 4-6 at Donington, but at Montreal, Bailey led while Acheson hit a manhole cover which had became airborne, three following cars hitting it and leading to the race being red flagged. The Bailey/Blundell Nissan was second.

Mexico City brought the end of fuel-regulating Group C competition, and ironically Nissan Motorsport Europe’s most successful, and last, WSC race. When Schlesser/Baldi’s Mercedes was disqualified for having taken on 0.1 litres too much fuel, the sister car of Jochen Mass/Michael Schumacher was declared winner. The Germans had caught the Bailey/Blundell Nissan when it had been leading, before in the words of one report it “had proved absolutely lethal on its Dunlop wets” once the heavens opened in the last 15 laps, losing up to 15 seconds per lap. The sister R90C of Acheson/Brancatelli finished fourth.

Nissan’s board had decided to abandon European and WSC aspirations and concentrate upon Devendorf’s successful NPTI operation in IMSA. With Geoff Brabham, NPTI would win four consecutive IMSA GTP titles for the Japanese marque, 1988-91. Geoff recalls: “In 1989 our Nissan IMSA team went to Le Mans basically as a reconnaissance mission to learn. I drove for the European Nissan Team with my US team-mates. We were not their number one priority, but we did OK until the engine failed. The main thing in my mind was the brakes being terrible. At the end of the straight I was hard on them hoping to stop and the Mercedes, which won, came straight past on full noise before braking. I was not happy!

“In 1990 the US team prepared and ran the car. Nissan had three teams, European, Japanese and US, all run separately. We were unlucky as halfway through the race we were swapping the lead back and forth with the Jaguar – the US-run Jag funnily. It was like an IMSA race. Anyway, at that point we were OK on fuel and the Jag wasn’t, so we knew they had to slow down. But the fuel-tank bladder split and put us out. It was really disappointing as we could have been the first Japanese car to win, which would have been really big.

The year-old Courage R89C shipped 59 laps to the winning Jaguar at Le Mans in 1990

The year-old Courage R89C shipped 59 laps to the winning Jaguar at Le Mans in 1990

Getty Images

“The Lola was not a good car. It did OK in the long-distance races but when I first started driving for Nissan it was a struggle as the chassis and aero were not good in the higher-downforce shorter races. It wasn’t until Nissan USA built its own chassis and aerodynamics that we started to win. Kas Kastner was the general manager and the link between the team and Nissan USA. Trevor Harris designed the chassis and was my race engineer, and John Caldwell built the engines. The US team operated on its own funded by Nissan USA.

“Actually the US GTP car had way more downforce than the Lola, but nowhere near the downforce of the Dan Gurney Toyotas in 1992/93 or the Peugeot I won Le Mans with in ’93. The dominant Nissan IMSA cars had great engines, good chassis and an awesome team. But aero-wise they were not as good as the designers tried to make out. The Toyota seriously kicked our butt in the end.”


Nissan-R89C

A huge company with big racing ambitions, Nissan failed where Ford once succeeded, but in period its 1989 Nissan R89C was a spectacular new Group C challenger to Sauber-Mercedes, Jaguar and Porsche…

WINDSCREEN
One of the longest lead-time items on Group C closed-coupé cars – as on such classics as the Porsche 917 and Ferrari 512 of the 1970s – was always the windscreen moulding. Those used on the Nissan R89C reportedly proved problematic as body movement popped them from their seals

BODYWORK
Vacuum and heat-formed carbon/kevlar composite body designed by Lola/Nissan and developed in Cranfield Institute 1:3- scale wind tunnel testing

REAR WING
Centre-strut supported full-width rear wing overhung from rear of transmission casing – overall length of car 4800mm

TRANSMISSION
Hewland VGC five-speed and reverse transaxle gearbox beneath anchorage abutments above for inboard-mounted rear coil-spring/Koni low-pressure adjustable damper suspension units, pushrod operated from independent wishbone and link suspension below

ENGINE
Nissan VHR35 90-degree V8 32-valve 4-cam water-cooled engine with aluminium block and heads, Nikasil wet aluminium liners, steel crankshaft, titanium con-rods, Atsugi alloy pistons. Bore and stroke 85x77mm, displacing 3496cc. Semi-stressed as chassis member. 800bhp at 7600rpm and 2.2 bar turbo boost – max revs 9000

TURBOCHARGER
Engine induction via twin exhaust-driven IHI turbochargers, one slung outboard on each cylinder bank’s exhaust array

CHASSIS
Moulded kevlar and carbon composite monocoque with full underfloor ground-effect tunnels, designed by Paul Bailey, Lola Cars Ltd, Huntingdon, England

WHEELS & TYRES
Speedline 13.5x18in front wheels with Dunlop 18/320/6.50 tyres (front), 15x19in rear wheels with Dunlop 19/350/750 tyres. Initially cross-ply tyres all round, later cross-ply fronts/radial rears – then radials all round. Precise details varied from venue to venue

BRAKES
Original ventilated steel disc brakes proved inadequate at Le Mans particularly – replaced by Carbone Industrie 14.6in carbon discs with AP six-pot F1 calipers as used in 1990 Nissan R90C car variant

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

The livery birds: those Porsche paint jobs

MARTIN MEINERS PHOTOGRAPHY / PORSCHE

1: Joest Racing 956B, 1985 Le Mans winner.

GettyImages-2199630267

2: Kremer Leyton House 962C, 1989 Le Mans, retired.

GettyImages-2201189825

3: Obermaier Racing 956, 1983 Le Mans, seventh.

Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft

4: Kremer 962C in Mexico City, 1990.

GettyImages-2200105527

5: Alpha Racing Team 962C, 1990 Le Mans, third.

S21_5206_fine

6: Holbert Racing 962, 1986 Daytona 24 Hours, winner.

b-HDK5962

13: Le Mans Porsche Team Dauer 962, 1994 Le Mans, winner.

b-HDK6450

14: Bob Akin Motor Racing Coke 962, 1986 Sebring 12 Hours, winner.

GettyImages-2167427032

15: Britten-Lloyd Racing Liqui-Moly Equipe 962C, 1987 Le Mans, retired.

GettyImages-2201179947

16: Kremer 962C, 1986 Le Mans, retired.

GettyImages-2200250739

17: Team Salamin/Joest 962C, 1991 Mexico City 430km.

18: Konrad Motorsport/Joest 962C, 1991 Le Mans, seventh.

GettyImages-2201088813

19: John Fitzpatrick Racing 956, 1983 Le Mans, retired.

GettyImages-2200189089

20: Team Australia/Fitzpatrick 956, 1984 Le Mans, retired.

GettyImages-2201089211

21: Skoal Bandit Porsche Team/Fitzpatrick 962, 1984 Le Mans, retired.

GettyImages-2201088948

22: Sorga Joest Racing 956, 1983 Le Mans, sixth.

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Pivotal Porsche – the 956/962 years

1982

Not as easy as 1-2-3

Porsche laid down a marker with the 956 on its Le Mans 24 Hours debut in 1982. The in-house factory team’s trio of Rothmans-sponsored cars notched up a 1-2-3 in a portent of what was to come for the new Group C design. Yet it wasn’t as easy as it looked.

The 956 project had only been given the go-ahead at the beginning of the previous July — the start of the financial year at Porsche — and the design arrived at Le Mans with only one race and no endurance simulation under its belt. That was significant for a car that broke new ground for Porsche. It was the manufacturer’s first design built around a monocoque chassis and the prototype incorporated another first in ground-effect aero, yet it didn’t turn a wheel until the end of March.

Norbert Singer at Le Mans in 1974 offers advice to Helmuth Koinigg

Norbert Singer at Le Mans in 1974 offers advice to Helmuth Koinigg

Farbe

“There just wasn’t time for endurance testing,” recalls Norbert Singer, who headed up the design of the car. “We did our first test at Paul Ricard, raced at Silverstone, and then had to build up our three cars for Le Mans. We were sure the engine could do it because it had won the race the year before [in the 936], but the gearbox was new along with almost everything else. I was asked before the race how I felt and what our strategy was going to be. I said, ‘Let’s get to 12 hours and then 18 hours, and see if we are still running.’”

All three 956s were still running, though they had endured issues, when the clock ticked past the 18-hour mark in first, second and third positions. A late problem for the only rival within striking distance of the Porsche train meant there was nothing to stop the new car blocking out the podium.

“We finished 1-2-3, which was a great achievement,” says Singer. “We hadn’t done a 24-hour test, so seeing the three cars cross the line together was a big moment.”


1983

High drama right to the line

Finishes don’t come much more exciting than this. Two factory Porsches, both ailing, raced to the line in 1983 to claim a 1-2. Just. The engine in the winning 956 wouldn’t have managed another lap after claiming a narrow victory over a car that needed a change of front brake discs and was on its last dregs of fuel.

The winning car driven by Al Holbert, Vern Schuppan and Hurley Haywood looked home and dry in the closing hours. The other factory car shared by Jacky Ickx and Derek Bell had endured a difficult race from the moment the former was punted off on the opening lap. The complexion of the race changed when an incorrectly closed door was ripped off when Schuppan tried to shut it at speed.

It was a 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 for the 956 in ’83, but it was no easy ride for the eventual winner, right, which suffered overheating problems

It was a 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 for the 956 in ’83, but it was no easy ride for the eventual winner, right, which suffered overheating problems

A replacement was prepared in the pits and then the fix to keep it in place played havoc with the car’s cooling. “The air duct to the water radiator is in the door,” explains Singer, “so when the door is not properly fixed the airflow is spoiled and the engine started overheating.”

Holbert was tasked with nursing the car home. In the Ford Chicane he felt the engine seize and instinctively banged the car into first gear and stood on the throttle. Miraculously the engine freed and he set out for one last lap.

Bell was in pursuit after moving back onto the lead lap with 15 or so minutes to go. The car had cracked front brake disks, which team-mate Ickx had insisted needed changing. Bell, who took over for the run to the flag, successfully argued that they should push on in pursuit of a last-gasp victory with what they had.

“We were told never go use the transmission to slow the car, but over those last laps I beat the crap out of the gearbox,” recalls Bell, who was able to lap only a couple or so seconds off Ickx’s fastest lap. “I don’t remember the brakes getting any worse and I seemed to get quicker.”

Bell’s charge was to no avail. Holbert crossed the line to take victory by an official margin of 65sec, although Bell insists it was closer than that. His stepfather, sitting in the stands opposite the pits, had it at less than half that.


1985

Privateer prevails

The Porsche factory had boycotted Le Mans ’84 over a swathe of proposed changes that it argued went in the face of FIA stability rules. The way was left clear for the marque’s privateers and Joest Racing took over the baton with its Newman-sponsored 956. Twelve months later and with the Rothmans cars back on the grid, with the long wheelbase 962 version of the 956 design, normality looked set to be restored. Only Joest, this time with Paolo Barilla and ‘John Winter’ (aka Louis Krages) joining Klaus Ludwig in the same 956 chassis that had won in ’84, did it again.

The factory could finish no better than a distant third on a day that it endured reliability issues — the third-place car driven by Bell and Hans Stuck suffered two front wheelbearing failures – and was outraced by the best of its customers. A Rothmans car failed to lead a single lap of the race! The Joest 956 was faster than the works cars, and used less fuel along the way. Exactly how Joest did it remains shrouded in mystery, as well as a controversial topic.

Joest’s Newman-sponsored 956 was a controversial winner in 1985 – but it outclassed the works team

Joest’s Newman-sponsored 956 was a controversial winner in 1985 – but it outclassed the works team

DPPI

Reinhold Joest had been developing Porsche’s 956 concept from the moment he got his hands on one of the cars after its release to customers for the 1983 season. He built his own engines, tweaked the engine electronics, swapped from the factory-supplied Bilstein dampers to Sachs units and produced his own underfloors. Those are all facts.

Talk of special grease and gearbox oil should probably be regarded as red herrings. They resulted from a throwaway joke, insists Singer. The less-understeery characteristics of the 956 in comparison with the 962C was also a factor, reckons Ludwig. But rumours that Joest somehow got around the fuel restrictions of the Group C formula have never gone away. So constant were the visitors – both race officials and rival team members – to the Joest pit to look at the car’s fuel readings that the late Domingos Piedade, the squad’s team manager, placed a piece of paper over the meter on the rig. On it he drew a single finger pointing upwards. The message to those with prying eyes was clear.


1987

Eggs in one basket

In 1987, Derek Bell, right, made it two wins on the trot at  Le Mans with the Porsche works team

In 1987, Derek Bell, left, made it two wins on the trot at Le Mans with the Porsche works team

Porsche kept its winning sequence going at Le Mans in 1987 in what nearly turned into its annus horribilis. One of the three cars was crashed in the pre-event shakedown at Weissach, which meant the team headed to Le Mans without a spare. Another was ruled out of the race by an accident in qualifying and then a car was lost at the start of the second hour as a result of poor-quality fuel.

That left a single 962C, driven by Bell, Holbert and Stuck, to fly the flag for Porsche in the face of a concerted assault from the TWR Jaguar team on its second appearance at Le Mans. Bell, Holbert and Stuck made it six in a row for the Porsche Group C car after leading the majority of the way. But the Jaguars put them under pressure until deep into the race.

GettyImages-1922470

“We had a lot of bad luck and Jaguar was pretty strong that year,” says Singer, “but you only need one car to win a race.”


1990

Old racer with new tricks

The 956/962 was the bedrock of the grid in the world championship and beyond. The factory wound down its works programme after Le Mans ’88 and left its privateers to fly the flag. It offered works assistance to old nemesis Joest from midway through ’89, but it was one of the marque’s most loyal customers that produced an amazing performance in 1990. Brun Motorsport came within 15 minutes of splitting the TWR Jags that eventually finished 1-2.

The story of how the 962C nearly got on the second step of the podium in its dotage is all the more remarkable because the star driver in the car, Oscar Larrauri, had to sit out much of the race after a major accident on Saturday morning in the support race for Renault 21 Turbos. That left team boss Walter Brun and Jesus Pareja, a pair of drivers who weren’t in the same league as the Argentinian, to do much of the donkey work.

The 962C of Brun lasted more than 350 laps at  Le Mans in 1990, giving the Jaguars a fright

The 962C of Brun lasted more than 350 laps at Le Mans in 1990, giving the Jaguars a fright

Brun had opted to run the Repsol-sponsored 962C with a special short tail developed by the team for the new-look Circuit de la Sarthe: 1990 was the year, of course, that two chicanes were inserted into the Mulsanne Straight. The works-assisted Joest cars ran low-downforce long-tails and as a result were outpaced.

The heroic efforts of Brun and Pareja came to nought when an oil union split at the end of the Mulsanne Straight. Pareja made it around Mulsanne Corner but his 962 stopped in the old signalling pits and the driver collapsed into the arms of team members. It was a heart-rending moment.


1994

956/962 in seventh heaven

The final Le Mans win for a design a dozen years in age was based on duff information. Porsche research and development boss Horst Marchart was convinced that McLaren was going to bring the McLaren F1 to the 24 Hours in 1994 and wanted to know if the car Singer had up his sleeve could beat it to honours in the GT class, which had been re-introduced the previous year.

When Singer told his boss that the update of the 911 Turbo S LM raced in ’93 wouldn’t be up to the job, Marchart gave him a week to come up with a plan B. He opted for what could be described as plan D – D for Dauer. Sometime 962 privateer entrant Jochen Dauer had been looking for help from Porsche to get certification for his road-going version of the car, so Singer came up with the idea of a car that came to be known as the Dauer 962 LM Porsche.

The car that triumphed overall to give the 956/962 its seventh victory on the Circuit de la Sarthe shouldn’t really have been in the mix. The Group C prototypes, racing at Le Mans for the final time in modified form, were faster, though the GT machinery had an advantage on fuel capacity.

Dauer 962s came home 1-3 in 1994, 12 years after the 956 made its debut, giving Porsche its 13th win at La Sarthe (that figure is now 19)

Dauer 962s came home 1-3 in 1994, 12 years after the 956 made its debut, giving Porsche its 13th win at La Sarthe (that figure is now 19)

Yet Porsche claimed outright win number 13 with the car driven by Yannick Dalmas, Mauro Baldi and Hurley Haywood when the best of the Group C cars, the Toyota 90C-V entered by the Japanese SARD team, ran into gear linkage problems with 90 minutes to go. It was, however, touch and go whether the Porsche would make it cleanly to the finish. The winning car had already needed one driveshaft replacing and Singer could smell the overheating grease from the CV joints each time the car pitted.

“We kept looking at the grease on the CV joints and we decided to wait until changing the halfshaft,” recalls Singer. “Then the Toyota had its problem and we said, ‘Now we don’t even think about it.’ Mr Marchart asked what the situation was. I said I wasn’t going to tell him because then you would start to get nervous.”

Special Issue Contents Archive - Motor Sport Magazine

Porsche 956 & 962 face-off

Photography Marc Riccioni  /  Taken from Motor Sport, June 2022


These are none other than the first and last Porsches to win the Le Mans 24 Hours during the legendary Group C era. Not examples of those cars, but the actual cars. And this is the first time that Porsche has allowed them to be brought together and tested by a motor journalist. This, then, is quite an occasion. But there’s more here, even than that. You might expect two such famous racing cars to be grizzled warriors, veterans of dozens of fights that took place all over the world during the superb first six years of the Group C era. But they are not. In fact their race records are staggeringly short: for Porsche 956-002 did Le Mans in 1982 and, apart from one demonstration run by Derek Bell the following year, was then frozen in aspic for the next four decades. By comparison Porsche 962-006 was only a little busier: It did the Spa 1000Kms in 1986, where Bob Wollek and Jochen Mass were delayed by a puncture. It did the Fuji 1000Kms later that year where it retired with a transmission fault, then it did Le Mans in 1987 which it won. And that was that. Two cars with a grand total of four races and zero accidents between them.

Both cars are in their classic Rothmans liveries; the 956 has been untouched since its single outing at Le Mans

Both cars are in their classic Rothmans liveries; the 956 has been untouched since its single outing at Le Mans

Marc Riccioni

Which means that what you see now, really, is what won Le Mans then. Had they done dozens of races thereafter, they’d have been pulled apart dozens of times too, gained engines, gearboxes, bits of bodywork and who knows what else that they’d never have had at their moment of greatest glory. But both cars won Le Mans and never raced again, which means they are time capsules.

How then is it that both appear perfectly preserved, with none of the physical evidence that would inevitably accrue on their surfaces after 24 hours of battle? For the 956, because it was going to the museum, it was decreed it needed to be visually perfect, so its blemishes were removed. For the 962 it was prepared for Le Mans in 1988, and therefore wore Shell Dunlop colours, but it sat out the show as the T-car before being returned to its classic Rothmans livery.

subtle differences in style yet neither share panels

Subtle differences in style yet neither share panels

Marc Riccioni

The podium at Le Mans in 1982 was an all Porsche affair, with 956-002 giving Jacky Ickx his sixth win

The podium at Le Mans in 1982 was an all Porsche affair, with 956-002 giving Jacky Ickx his sixth win

Marc Riccioni

We had them to ourselves for three days straight, during which I drove both on the Goodwood race track and up the Goodwood hill. We finished with me driving the 962C in a high-speed demonstration with 17 other Group C Porsches on the Saturday evening of the 79th Goodwood Members’ Meeting. I will never forget it.

But for now, we should look at these cars and how they got to be that way. And perhaps the first thing to mention is that many of us who are today old enough to remember the 1982 introduction of Group C didn’t think it a good idea at all. The slim regulation book was encouraging, but its key edict was not: no car could use more than 600 litres of fuel in a 1000km race, or 2600 litres in a 24-hour race. It was a fuel consumption formula, destined to turn the top tier of sports car racing into an economy run. Wasn’t it?


The only good thing was Porsche seemed singularly ill-suited to the new regime. Good? Because it had already won half the Le Mans 24 Hours held in the previous dozen years. It had in that time alone overtaken Bentley, Ford and Jaguar’s total scores in the race leaving just Ferrari’s total of nine to beat, and the Scuderia hadn’t won there in 17 years. Porsche had been the dominant force in sports car racing but now it would require something genuinely extraordinary for Group C not to end that era.

“For all Porsche had achieved in racing, it had never designed a monocoque car”

The problems that faced Porsche were numerous and serious. The fact it had never designed a ground-effect car was one that was common to most manufacturers looking to join the new formula. But Porsche was doubly disadvantaged by the fact it had neither the time nor the money to develop the 120-degree V6 it wanted for the new car, so would have to rely on its old flat six. But as Ferrari had found out two seasons earlier when its flat-12 312T5 plunged the team from championship winners to failing to qualify when ground effect really got going in F1, a flat formation engine is just about the last thing you want getting in the way of your underbody ground effect aerodynamics.

The 956’s 2.65-litre flat six had been used at Le Mans in the 936 of 1981 – powering Ickx and Derek Bell to victory

The 956’s 2.65-litre flat six had been used at Le Mans in the 936 of 1981 – powering Ickx and Derek Bell to victory

And that engine would have to provide big power for its size because Porsche didn’t have the luxury enjoyed by the likes of Mercedes-Benz which had a 5-litre V8 it could turbocharge and slot in the back of its contender. But perhaps the biggest and most surprising of all was that for all Porsche had achieved in racing and despite the fact that Jaguar had first done so in the 1950s and Lola in the 1960s, it had never designed a monocoque race car, a construction method the Group C regulation demanded.

With those financial constraints, the 956 came to the grid with the same 2.65-litre twin-turbo motor used to win Le Mans the previous year in the spaceframe 936 (which itself had literally been removed from the museum to do the race) and which had actually been designed for an earlier stillborn IndyCar programme.

Ickx at La Sarthe, ’82

Ickx at La Sarthe, ’82

Getty Images

For Norbert Singer, the man who would more than any other be responsible for the 956 and 962’s utter domination of sports car racing, it was the chance of a lifetime and the results spoke for themselves. “Of all the cars we made,” he told me, “this was the one that was the most successful and over the longest period. It is my favourite.”

While others saw the problems inherent in the new formula, Singer saw opportunity. “It was great. It was a new challenge. We’d always tried to make cars with the minimum weight, maximum power and best aerodynamics and while that was never boring, it’s all we’d ever done. And now with having to take fuel consumption into account, it was suddenly very interesting.”

Here’s the same 962 making history at Le Mans in 1987, at Dunlop Curve

Here’s the same 962 making history at Le Mans in 1987, at Dunlop Curve

Getty Images

Jonathan Palmer told me that what he most liked about Group C was that it was an engineer’s formula and that the team with the smartest brains behind it would always do best. But so great a leap did the 956 represent over the 936 it replaced, that the limiting factor at first were its drivers. “I did some lap simulations in the car and realised that it would be quite fast,” explained Norbert, “but not even Jacky [Ickx] could get close to those times at first. It took some months until we did at test at Paul Ricard and suddenly him and Derek were going around three seconds a lap quicker in the same car, and we hadn’t touched it! They’d just got used to the downforce.”

The car was also prepared in astonishingly quick time. Six months before Le Mans 1982, not a single 956 had been built. Three months before not one had even run. Yet come the big day there were three 956s on the grid and, 24 hours later, three on the podium too. It ushered in an era of almost mind-boggling success: it was the first of six Le Mans victories in a row, and contributed to the first of five World Sportscar Championships. Across the Atlantic, the 962 won the Daytona 24 Hours three times in succession, and netted a hat-trick of IMSA titles on the way. And those are just the headlines.

A dream assignment for our writer, at the rear of a Porsche Group C cavalcade at Goodwood’s 79th Members’ Meeting in April

A dream assignment for our writer, at the rear of a Porsche Group C cavalcade at Goodwood’s 79th Members’ Meeting in April

“The reason it lasted so long is simple,” Jacky Ickx once told me. “When it was new it was so far ahead of its time it took years for others just to catch up. Meanwhile Porsche continually developed the car to keep it ahead. I can remember when I first drove it thinking ‘this is special’ but I didn’t realise how special it was.”


And that’s the point. Once Porsche had got its advantage, it didn’t squander it. It pushed on relentlessly, developing the car, keeping ahead of the opposition until finally the fundamental age of its design and the inherent weakness of its aluminium monocoque was exposed by the new era of carbon tubs like those sported by archrival Jaguar. But by then its legacy had already been long secured.

I approach the 956 as you might an unexploded bomb. The car is unique, so valuable and precious I fear that one false move on my part is all that would be required for disaster to unfold. By contrast, the team from the museum who look after it are completely relaxed. You can’t stand or rest any part of yourself on the door sill, otherwise, it is completely robust. So I swing myself into it and down into a tiny cockpit

DSC02497

To me the outside still looks modern and beautiful, but in here, frankly, it’s all a bit of a mess. There are buttons, switches and dials I recognise from period 911 road cars, bits of Dymo tape labelling gauges, a leatherbound Momo wheel with a radio transmit button attached and nothing else. I can see where the edges of that wheel have been worn smooth and discoloured by Jacky and Derek’s gloves as they wrestled with this car for a day and night to bring it home at an average speed including all stops of over 126mph. Makes you think, doesn’t it?

The start procedure could scarcely be more simple: turn the key. You don’t even need to press a button. Keep your foot off the throttle and wait for the flat six to burst angrily into life. Which it does, and then idles as easily (albeit rather more noisily) as a 911 SC. The big difference between this engine and that of even a 911 Turbo of this age is that the race motor needed greater efficiency than could be achieved with single cam, two-valve heads, but it would not be possible to use a twin cam, four-valve layout with air-cooling, so this Porsche is cooled by both air and water, the former for the block, the latter for the heads. It’s capable of producing around 650bhp, which was already probably slightly more than the rule makers had envisaged.

It’s testament to Porsche designer Norbert Singer that the 962 still looks modern...

It’s testament to Porsche designer Norbert Singer that the 962 still looks modern… …but inside, with its dials, buttons and switches, we’re back to the 1980s

Marc Riccioni

The gearbox has five speeds, laid out in a conventional racing pattern with first back and towards you, and in traditional Porsche racing practice, it also has synchromesh. This means the box is a little heavier and the change a little slower, but Porsche deemed that small price to pay compared to the number of retirements suffered by rivals with uncompromising dog boxes. First requires a healthy tug on the lever, and like all the other controls the clutch is heavy, but the motor sufficiently tractable to allow a smooth getaway. And there you are, driving the 1982 Le Mans winner around Goodwood.

“The 956 was utterly viceless, the quickest out there and so forgiving on the limit”

It’s obviously not a track where Group C cars ever competed, but with its long, flowing high-speed corners it’s a natural fit for such a car, though you’d want Porsche’s short-tail high downforce bodywork for racing. And once you’ve got a feel for the way the controls want to work, the car is utterly reassuring from the outset. Unlike a Jaguar Group C car, which needs watching both while braking into and accelerating away from corners, the 956 seems instantly on your side. You feel everything through the steering which writhes gently around in your hands while it lets you pick your apexes with pinpoint accuracy. The overall gearing is high which means that first is actually a proper gear which might even have been used for maximum thrust away from Arnage or Mulsanne, while fifth will take you to 230mph and beyond.

Derek Bell describes the 956 as “utterly viceless, a car that rewarded the professional driver by being the quickest car out there and the amateur by being so forgiving on the limit. Porsche understood better than anyone that it was not enough for the car just to be fast: it had to be fast for 24 hours, regardless of the talent of the man behind the wheel or how tired he was. Which meant it had to be easy to drive.”

But the engine, despite its water-cooled, multi-valve heads, still feels decidedly old school. With a compression ratio of something like 7.0:1, it’s lethargic off boost, with the power arriving in a single shot somewhere between 3000-4000rpm, hurling you down the curving straight towards St Mary’s at a simply staggering velocity. A glimpse, and no more than that, of what Messrs Bell and Ickx experienced at Le Mans 40 years ago hoves into view. And you think: two drivers, unassisted steering, heavy controls, zero air-conditioning, 54 other cars on the same track, night time, rain… and you conclude these people are supermen, for there is no other rational explanation for what they did, not as a one-time, never-to-be-repeated all-out win-or-bust bid for glory, but part of their every day job.

And they kept on doing it, in Bell’s case as the only driver the factory retained from the very start of its Group C adventure in 1982 to the very end in 1988 where, having already collected an unprecedented succession of seven straight wins at Le Mans, it failed by minutes to collect an eighth. So that last win came in 1987 with chassis 962-006, and on first inspection you might think there was little difference between the two machines. And in one sense they are very similar, in others really rather different. So we’ll deal with the red herring first.

The 962 may have had a new name, but it was not a new car. It wasn’t created to win Le Mans, but as a direct response to IMSA banning the 956 because it placed the driver’s feet ahead of the front axle line. The 962 was a long wheelbase 956 with what was added between the axles removed from ahead of the front wheels, which is why it looks more snub-nosed and less graceful than a 956. The 962 made its US debut in 1984 and when IMSA safety standards were adopted for the World Sportscar Championship the next year, the 956 was replaced by the 962C for customer and factory teams alike.

It was the other changes, those that were less easy to see, that really upped the pace and potential of first the 956 and the 962. The first big change came late in 1982 when fully electronic Bosch Motronic engine management was introduced, bringing ignition and fuelling together under one system. This, combined with ever increasing compression ratios, rising from 7.0:1 to 9.0:1 between 1982-87, meant not just more power but, just as important, greater fuel efficiency. So they could not just go faster but, crucially, do so for longer on the limited fuel allowance.

Likewise the aerodynamics. Look at these two for long enough and you’ll realise they don’t share a single panel. “Porsche were never one to rest on their laurels, even when they were winning everything,” says Bell. “They never stopped tinkering.”

The engine itself grew in size, with a new 3-litre, fully water-cooled motor introduced for the 1987 season which not only used less fuel than the 956 engine, it also had 750bhp, at least 100bhp more than the 956 motor. A special qualifying engine for the 1988 race was reputed to put out over 850bhp.

How much faster was a factory 962 than a 956? Well a simple comparison of Le Mans pole times revealed the 962C in 1987 was 7.3sec a lap quicker than the 956 had managed in 1982, which perhaps isn’t that extraordinary given natural development over a five-year period. Until, that is, you consider that the 1987 lap time was done after the installation of the slow chicane before the Dunlop Bridge, requiring drivers to shed and then regain something close to 100mph. Then it is astonishing.

“Porsche were never one to rest on their laurels, even when they were winning everything”

I’m more comfortable inside the 962C, not because of the longer wheelbase, but because the lanky Hans Stuck joined Derek Bell and Al Holbert in this car for Le Mans in 1987 and his seat is still in it. The dash has changed a bit: there are a couple of small digital displays where you can call up information via one of three rotary dials, the others adjusting mixture and boost. But it’s still very familiar. The start procedure is the same, the pedals feel the same as does the gearbox. I’m told that today the car is running at around 660bhp, a long way off maximum boost but probably close to what you’d use for long-distance race pace.

And what does that feel like? Well if I tell you its power-to-weight ratio even in this trim is more than twice that of Porsche’s current sports car flagship, the 911 Turbo S, you will appreciate that here is a car that will accelerate in a manner that even those experienced with some of the fastest supercars could even conceive.

Yet for all its extra power, it has less lag and a more progressive power delivery than the 956, for which you can thank Motronic, the extra cubic capacity and higher compression ratio. It builds, quite gently at first. Between 3000rpm to perhaps 4500rpm it’s going nicely, accelerating like a rather healthy hypercar. But then it lunges into a different dimension of performance, one which makes your stomach feel hollow and your legs go weak. Although no one asked me to, I changed at 7200rpm out of respect though the line on the dial says 8400rpm, at which point I’m sure it would still be pouring on the power.

Derek Bell lets his hair down after taking his fifth and final Le Mans 24 Hours victory

Derek Bell lets his hair down after taking his fifth and final Le Mans 24 Hours victory

Getty Images

We only had 15 minutes for the demonstration, enough for perhaps nine laps of Goodwood, probably less than a third of a stint at Le Mans. I tried to imagine, tried to relax into the car, forget its importance and value and make like Derek or Jacky in France. And of course it’s not possible because, apart from anything else, we weren’t allowed to overtake and had to follow a course car, which in this case was a 911 GT3 going as fast as a skilled driver could make it go, but which by 962 standards wasn’t fast at all. I hung back, created as big a gap as I dared and then went for it until I caught the back of the Group C train again. And it was enough to feel the bodywork start to generate some downforce, enough to put some loading in the suspension, enough to gun that incredible motor through the gears until I saw 6000rpm in fifth. I don’t know how fast that was; probably not fast by 962C standards, but by Goodwood standards it felt like it was flying.

Honking around the back of the circuit with the sun dipping and the headlights of a grid-full of Group C Porsches piercing the night ahead of me was as close to a romantic experience as I’ve had on a track. It was magical, not just to be in that car, but to see the greatest collection of the greatest sports racing cars ever made by the greatest manufacturer of such cars ever seen in action in one place.

“It was as close to a romantic experience as I’ve had on track”

And then it was over and 956-002 and 962-006 were back under their awnings. Will it happen again? Perhaps for the 50th anniversary in 10 years’ time, if such celebrations are even allowed by then. If not the spectacle provided those who were there to see it with a memory to last a lifetime.


Porsche 956

POWER: 620bhp
ENGINE: 2.65-litre six-cylinder boxer turbo
WEIGHT: 850kg
TOP SPEED: 224mph


Porsche 962C

POWER: 700bhp
ENGINE: 3-litre six-cylinder boxer biturbo
WEIGHT: 850kg
TOP SPEED: 224mph