When running behind Ricciardo in the grand prix, Norris asked the team – in hope rather than expectation – whether they could race and was told firmly “no”. McLaren was not about to risk its 1-2. The reason Norris was behind Ricciardo, having qualified ahead of him for the sprint, was just about the choreography of the start. As Hamilton had bogged down directly ahead of him, Norris was delayed as Ricciardo from the other side was able to surge past from a row behind. What Hamilton later described as being about 2mm too deep on his clutch paddle in the sprint is what in hindsight decided it was Ricciardo and not the faster-qualifying Norris who won the
grand prix.
At Sochi Norris had secured a brilliant pole position in the damp conditions, one which flattered the car. He’d lost out to Carlos Sainz’s Ferrari at the start but was significantly faster and gentler on the tyres and was later able to make an overtake on track for the lead. It took Hamilton until the second stint before he was behind Norris after which he began to close him down and apply the pressure. Norris took it all in his stride and afterwards Hamilton said that he’d ran out of ideas and grip and wasn’t going to be able to do anything about passing. But then the rain. Like Norris, Hamilton initially ignored the team call to pit for inters as the shower was beginning to ease off. But Mercedes insisted next lap, seeing on the radar a new cloud burst on its way.
Crucially, Norris was not overruled in the same way, not informed of the second shower and came home a distraught eighth. With just slightly different luck on the Monza and Sochi weekends, Norris might have won two consecutive grands prix in what was not the fastest car. So the luck he received on Sunday was somewhat overdue.