In 2009 Peter Boland, who had been Dennis’s in-flight butler on his Bombardier Challenger 604 – his large twin-engined $30-odd million private jet – had his 15 minutes of fame when he took his ex-boss to an employment tribunal for unfair dismissal, his beef being that he believed that Ron had fired him for being gay, despite his being straight. A perplexing platform on which to base a private legal action against a stubborn multi-millionaire, it was made more difficult still for Boland by his decision to represent himself instead of hiring legal counsel. The two-day hearing, which took place in a small and tatty court room in Southampton, was sometimes unnerving and occasionally hilarious, especially when Boland cross-examined Dennis, haltingly and incompetently, surprising everyone by accusing him of racism as well as homophobia. He could support neither allegation. It was an ordeal that Ron found both humiliating and infuriating, so much so that the judge occasionally had to tick him off for his failure to accord his maladroit cross-examiner an appropriate level of deference, which admonishments the F1 legend did not enjoy.
I attended both days, driving to and from the court alongside Ron in the back of his chauffeur-driven S-class Merc, and we always knew we would win, not least because not only was I openly gay but also – a slam-dunk winner this – so too was Jamie Siggs, the in-flight butler whom Dennis had appointed to replace Boland when he fired him for reasons completely unrelated to homophobia or racism.
In the end Boland withdrew his suit, and the hearing came to an abrupt end. I then wrote the following statement for Ron, which we gave to the attending journalists and they used in their reports: “This case has been hurtful, irritating and unnecessary, in the sense that no impropriety ever took place, which Mr Boland now concedes. Equally, Mr Boland accepts that I have never said or done anything either racist or homophobic. Moreover, every action taken by my colleagues and me in connection with Mr Boland’s dismissal was done with the intention of minimising the negative impact of that dismissal on his reputation and employment record. Had he not embarked on this unsuccessful and injudicious legal action, which he has anyway now abandoned, those goals could have been achieved.”