What made Watkins Glen so good: F1's greatest American track

F1

The US has delivered a mixed bag of race circuits to the F1 World Championship, but one track stands above all the rest: Watkins Glen

Start of the 1969 Watkins Glen Grand Prix

Jochen Rindt leads at Watkins Glen in 1969

Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Max Verstappen won Sunday’s Miami Grand Prix impressively, and, if the race was a bit of DRS fest, nonetheless he played that game as well as anyone, although Fernando Alonso, George Russell and Kevin Magnussen also put up stout performances.

There will be three grands prix in the USA this season. A trio of grands prix have been run in the USA in the same year before – at Long Beach, Detroit and Caesar’s Palace in 1982 – but elsewhere it has happened only once, for reasons of Covid emergency, in Italy, which hosted grands prix at Monza, Mugello and Imola in 2020. Moreover, no country has staged grands prix at more circuits than has the USA: the current running total is 11, and Las Vegas will bring up the dozen in November this year.

The complete list reads as follows, chronologically: Sebring, Riverside, Watkins Glen, Long Beach, Caesar’s Palace, Detroit, Dallas, Phoenix, Indianapolis, Austin, Miami and Las Vegas. Not all of them were great racetracks. Detroit, Dallas and Caesar’s Palace were the worst. The best? Austin, Long Beach and Watkins Glen.

1970 US GP Watkins Glen Emerson Fittipaldi Lotus

Fittipaldi celebrates first F1 win at ‘The Glen’

Getty Images

The Glen hosted 20 United States Grands Prix, one every year from 1961 to 1980, which is more than any other US circuit, and that is only right and proper because it was the best of the bunch. Many of Formula 1’s GOATs of the era won there – Jim Clark and Graham Hill three times each; Jackie Stewart, James Hunt and Carlos Reutemann two victories apiece; Jochen Rindt, Emerson Fittipaldi, Ronnie Peterson, Niki Lauda and Gilles Villeneuve all won there, too. Francois Cevert won there in 1971 and died there in 1973. Only one other Formula 1 driver also lost his life at the Glen, Helmuth Koinigg, the following year (1974), and, whatever you do, please never search the web for images of his grisly accident. Believe me. Just don’t.

From the archive

Why was the Glen so good? It was quick, fluent and undulating, its corners all challenging until the introduction in 1975 of a chicane in the middle of what had been fast uphill esses, where Cevert had died two years before, and its asphalt was smooth by the standards of the 1960s, although a few querulous drivers had begun to call it ‘too bumpy’ by the late 1970s. The majority of the quick men tended to like it a lot. Jackie Stewart described it as “not the most difficult or demanding racetrack in the world, but a good racetrack, and a fair racetrack”. Faint praise? Perhaps, but JYS uttered those words in 1974, his first year as a pundit rather than a driver, and it is possible that within his rhetoric was couched a desire to downplay the heroism of the men who were still strutting their stuff where so recently he had held dominion. Moreover, the previous year he had called the Glen’s esses “along with the Harbour Chicane at Monaco, the most demanding corners in the racing world”, which was probably what he really thought. When you consider that he and his comrades were racing in those days at places as intimidating as the old Nürburgring, the old Interlagos, Österreichring, Montjuïc and Clermont-Ferrand, that is saying something.

Emerson Fittipaldi, who scored his maiden grand prix victory at the Glen in 1970, in only his fourth championship F1 start, said it was “like Mosport, a bit scary and full of elevation changes, but on a bigger and better scale”. Mario Andretti was often unbeatable in 1978 in the superb ground-effect Lotus 79. He did not win at the Glen that year – he crashed his intended race car in the race-morning warm-up, he never felt comfortable in the spare, and its engine anyway went bang after 27 laps – but in qualifying the day before he had been untouchable. “Man, the 79 was made for this track,” he had said. ‘When I got through that turn at the end of the straight without braking and came out with more revs on the clock than before, I knew I was on a quick one. It’s the sort of lap you can do only once. That’s why I came in and parked it straight afterwards.” He had been right. No-one else had got anywhere near him and that quali lap had ended up 1.065sec faster than anyone else’s.

1979 US GP Watkins Glen Gilles Villeneuve Ferrari

Villeneuve wet-weather masterclass in ’79

Getty Images

But the most brilliant driving ever seen at the Glen was an extraordinarily bravura display, by Gilles Villeneuve, in 1979. On the Saturday, on a dry track, Alan Jones bagged the pole in his Williams with a lap time of 1min 35.615sec. On the Friday the rain had been truly torrential, and all but six drivers had duly stayed in their pit garages. Four of those six had tiptoed around, slip-sliding away, recording lap times of around three minutes.

From the archive

Then Jody Scheckter, Ferrari’s team leader and the newly-crowned world champion, had decided to give it a bit of a go. He had quickly returned – “I’ll admit I nearly s*** myself” – having posted a lap time of 2min 11.029sec. Was he quickest? No, he was second-quickest. Quickest was Villeneuve, who splashed his Ferrari around in 2min 1.437sec – almost 10 seconds quicker than Scheckter, the new champion, in the same car.

My dear friend, the veteran journalist Nigel Roebuck, was watching on the pit wall with Jacques Laffite, who had not turned a wheel in his Ligier that day. “Look at him,” said Laffite as Villeneuve hurtled past in a ball of spray. “He’s different from the rest of us, on a separate level.” That he was. On race day, two days later, it rained again, and he won by the best part of a minute.