MPH: How might mischievous F1 drivers defy race ban for swearing?

F1

F1 drivers face a month-long ban if they swear too many times during a press conference. Has the FIA gone too far this time? asks Mark Hughes. And what will the crafty grid do about it?

Lando Norris and Max Verstappen laughing in front of stern faced Mohammed Ben Sulayem

There's comic strip potential for sniggering drivers to outfox a strict Ben Sulayem

Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto

Mark Hughes

FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem has doubled down on his position regarding swearing following the pushback he received from the Grand Prix Drivers Association (GPDA) last year after Max Verstappen was punished for swearing in an FIA press conference. Changes to the FIA sporting code mean that an F1 driver will now be fined €40,000 (£33,750) for a first offence, €80,000 (£67,500) and a suspended one-month race ban for a second offence and €120,000 (£101,250) and an actual one-month race ban plus the loss of an unspecified number of championship points for a third offence.

If you stand back a little from it, there is a comedic element to this whole saga, one which is set up by the very structure of the sport. You have the drivers, by nature generally freewheeling types, not very interested in conformity, their choice of profession an almost explicit rejection of authority over their lives. You have the commercial entity of F1 itself, selling itself largely on the back of these people, their personalities and rivalries as well as their awesome skills. Neither are looking to be in control of anyone else. Then you have the governing body, almost explicitly looking for something to be in control of. Because if it’s not in control of its own championship, what is even its point?

Related article

As a governing body, it has done some very fine work over the decades, has used that control to protect the participants from themselves in terms of safety advances. The three bodies have rubbed along ok for the last few years, give or take a few squabbles.

But then one of those freewheeling, anti-authority types, the world champion no less, lets slip with an expressive emphasising adjective of the colourful type in an FIA press conference. The sort of language drivers have been using forever. It’s not being directed at anyone but simply lending some emotion to the description of a situation.

The FIA president, a man by temperament well-suited to having a prestigious title and who likes to be seen to be being in charge, takes exception to the swearing and punishes the world champion. Who responds with indignant mischief by making almost no comments at all in the next FIA conference – thereby making it almost meaningless – but inviting anyone to come and talk to him freely as soon as the conference is over. If it was a cartoon, the man in charge would be visibly fuming at being so easily foiled and made to look so powerless. And the drivers would be sniggering.

Max Verstappen laughs as he shakes the hand of Mohammed Ben Sulayem

Verstappen’s press conference protest made a mockery of Ben Sulayem

Clive Mason/F1 via Getty Images)

The GPDA then issues an open letter to the president, essentially asking him to refrain from treating them like children and to work together in enhancing the sport and oh by the way, where does the money from our fines go to? More mischief, more rejection of authority. The president responds by saying it’s none of their business where the money goes and not long after dismisses the auditors who were advising him and changes the statutes so that any such investigations are conducted internally.

With that done, he issues the revised sporting code. So in response to the drivers asking him to not hold onto the leash so tightly, he has wound it in tighter! Because he’s in control, you see.

A standing Mohammed Ben Sulayem points at George Russell who is reclined on a sofa

George Russell and his GPDA colleagues may be stirred into action by the penalties announced for swearing

Dan Istitene/F1 via Getty Images

Drivers do not fundamentally recognise control as a belief system. They’ll buy into it as far as is required in order to be able to do what they do, as a minor inconvenience but not something which has any intrinsic meaning. By nature they are not subservient. Which is partly what makes them great racing drivers.

But in escalating the squabble, the president may have passed the point at which drivers indulge the man in charge as being in charge. Far from extinguishing the problem, he might just have inflamed it. Which in comedy sketch terms is a fantastic dynamic.

In such a comedy, what might those mischievous drivers do next? Well, they might claim that the stress imposed upon them by all these directives has given them all Tourettes syndrome, which has caused them to swear involuntarily at random. Because the precise cause of Tourettes is not known, they might suggest that the FIA funds some research into the condition…