MPH: F1 stewards need a penalty as brutal as Verstappen's tactics — why not deduct points?

F1

Max Verstappen drove Lando Norris off the road in the past two GPs and did the same to Lewis Hamilton in 2021. It's an effective tactic, even when penalised, says Mark Hughes. So F1 stewards need tougher sanctions

Max Verstappen interviewed after 2024 F1 Mexican GP

Verstappen incurred 20sec of penalties in Mexico, but prevented Lando Norris from having a chance of victory

Rudy Carezzevoli/Getty via Red Bull

Mark Hughes

In the context of Max Verstappen going into ‘protect late championship points lead by threat of contact with the title rival’ mode, exactly as we saw late-season ’21, the setting for this weekend’s race is very significant.

Interlagos is a track layout perfectly configured for overtaking and general wheel-to-wheel action. In particular, the section from Junção (Turn 12) at the bottom of the hill, right the way through to Turns 4/5 of the following lap can potentially be one long manoeuvre for position, consisting of over half the track distance. Whichever place you try to defend ends up creating an opportunity elsewhere on the lap. The idea of being able to successfully defend position here against a faster car is a fairly weak one.

But Verstappen managed it for a long time in ’21 against Lewis Hamilton. He extended the number of laps he stayed ahead by his infamous Turn 4, ‘take the battle for position way off the track’ defence of what would otherwise have been a Hamilton pass. It was a tactic he repeated last weekend at Turn 7 in Mexico against Lando Norris.

Back in ’21 Hamilton, having avoided the contact Verstappen was more than willing to have (as it would freeze his points advantage if they both retired), regrouped and made the move work a few laps later by getting it completed on the corner approach – ie before Verstappen could force him wide.

The stewards’ guidance notes for such matters changed from ’22 as a result of Verstappen’s moves in Brazil and Jeddah ‘21. As a result, what was not penalised at Turn 4 in Brazil was given a 10sec penalty at Turn 7 Mexico last week.

You may have heard over the radio Verstappen’s apparent indifference to the penalty. Of course he was indifferent; he’d succeeded in putting Norris back behind him. Norris, needing to avoid contact above all else and seeing how he’d been driven him off the road three times in his last three Verstappen encounters (Austin T12, Mexico T4 and T7), felt obliged to sit behind the Red Bull until it pitted out of his way and took its penalties. Only then did Norris’s race really begin. Being behind Verstappen’s slower Red Bull for all those laps had left him 15sec behind the race-leading Ferrari of Carlos Sainz. He’d got this down to less than 5sec at the flag – suggesting he’d been denied a very real chance of victory by what was deemed to be an illegal move by Verstappen. Penalising Verstappen 10sec wasn’t ever going to give Norris his lost time back. So that penalty had not served the function of ensuring a fair competition.

Related article

The blatant tactics Verstappen reverts to in a title fight are not currently punished highly enough. A time penalty was not the appropriate or just action here. While the drivers are currently discussing whether any guideline changes should be made immediately or for next year, we head into a circuit layout absolutely inviting a repeat of Mexico T7 with the issue unresolved. The stewards need a tool at their disposal as brutal as Verstappen’s tactics. So, for example, if he refuses to give any place back which has been gained or defended in this manner, why can they not then issue a black flag? If that isn’t harsh enough, then maybe it’s time that points can be deducted rather than seconds added. With four races left, a line needs to be laid down.

Verstappen’s easily good enough to win this title fair and square, given his current points advantage. But at the moment, if he finds himself ahead there’s nothing to suggest he’ll change his tactics of minimising Norris’s points haul by whatever means necessary.