Mohammed Ben Sulayem: FIA president's controversial reign so far

His first unenviable task was to clear up the fallout and steady the ship, yet he immediately created contversy in his first press conference.

Hamilton and Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff refused to attend the FIA gala that night in protest of the Abu Dhabi events, breaking rules that require the presence of the top three drivers in the championship and the constructors’ title winners.

Inevitably, Ben Sulayem was asked whether Hamilton would be punished for this transgression. Rather than defusing the situation, he said: “We have to follow our rules. But it doesn’t stop us from making a champion feel good about the sport. It’s easy to be nice to people. But definitely if there is any breach, there is no forgiveness in this.”

In the end no action was taken but it set the tone for the months to come.

Fallout over Abu Dhabi

January 2023 

Concerns continued to grow with the handling of the fall-out from Abu Dhabi. Todt’s last act as president was to launch an inquiry, but it took two months before the FIA took any official action, removing Masi and announcing a restructure of race control, and a further month before the report was published.

It talked of “human error” and said Masi had not operated the safety car according to the regulations. But many regarded its conclusions as insubstantial and failing to get to the heart of what had gone wrong.

Hamilton row as FIA clamps down on jewellery

April 2022  

The FIA chose to make an issue of drivers wearing jewellery and non-regulation underwear during races. Existing rules banned the practice, but did not appear to have been enforced for years until they were raised at the Australian Grand Prix and presented as the wish of new race director Niels Wittich. The suggestion in the paddock was that this was being pushed by Ben Sulayem.

The predictable effect was to create a stand-off with Lewis Hamilton, who said that his nose ring could not be removed easily, while the FIA insisted that all of its rules should be followed.

A compromise was reached with a series of medical exemptions for the seven-time world champion but was only resolved at the British Grand Prix in July when Hamilton confirmed that the ring had been removed.

FIA and F1 clash over additional sprint race

April 2022 

Ben Sulayem blocked a unanimous agreement between the teams and F1 to increase the number of sprint races in 2023 from three to six.

Publicly, he said he wanted time to analyse its effect on workload at race control, but teams quickly briefed that he had asked the F1 to increase the fee it pays to the FIA to run race weekends. “This might be the first stand-off of many between the F1 and FIA,” we wrote at the time. By the time 2023 arrived, there were six sprints on the calendar.

Controversies escalate in first presidential interview

June 2022 

In his first interview as president, Ben Sulayem seemed to indicate that he was not in favour of drivers speaking out on political and social issues.

“Niki Lauda and Alain Prost only cared about driving,” Ben Sulayem said. “Now, [Sebastian] Vettel drives a rainbow bicycle, Lewis is passionate about human rights and [Lando] Norris addresses mental health.

“Everybody has the right to think. To me, it is about deciding whether we should impose our beliefs in something over the sport all the time. I am from an Arabian culture. I am international and Muslim. I do not impose my beliefs on other people. No way! Never.”

The drivers were unimpressed, and there was increasing concern within F1. Ben Sulayem later issued a clarifying social media post.

“As a driver, I have always believed in sport as a catalyst of progress in society,” he wrote. “That is why promoting sustainability, diversity and inclusion is a key priority of my mandate. In the same way, I value the commitment of all drivers and champions for a better future.”

FIA and F1 continue to clash

August 2022

The controversies kept coming. Ben Sulayem intervened on the issue of the new cars ‘porpoising’, much to the dismay of Red Bull, who felt that a resolution would benefit Mercedes.

Ben Sulayem then published the 2023 calendar early, without telling F1 president Stefano Domenicali or the teams that he was doing so — even though it is F1 which draws up the calendar. 

Cost cap haggling

October 2022

As the 2022 F1 season drew to a close, the controversies only gained momentum.

Red Bull was found to be the only team to have breached the cost cap in 2021, and negotiated its penalty with the FIA — as permitted by the financial regulations. Many thought that the team had been let off lightly when the penalty — a fine and reduced aerodynamic testing time — was announced. Christian Horner described the testing reduction as “an enormous amount”. Ferrari said that it was too low.

Drivers banned from speaking out

December 2022

In the winter of 2022, a clause was added into the sporting code that prohibits drivers from making “political, religious and personal statements or comments” without the written permission of the FIA, the impression being he was trying to muzzle them.

Initially, there was no public explanation of exactly what it meant or why it was done and several drivers voiced their opposition to the move at the start of the following season, including Max Verstappen, Alex Albon and Valtteri Bottas.

The FIA subsequently issued a three-page document to clarify the clause, explaining that drivers could still “express their views on any political, religious or personal matter… outside the scope of the international competition” and  “in their own space”. This would include through social media, as well as in interviews or press conferences.

It said that events “should not be used as a platform for international advocacy” and that drivers “are not permitted to make political, religious and/or personal statements in violation of the general principle of neutrality” during the pre-race drivers’ parade and national anthem, as well as in the podium ceremony or cool-down room.

Race Control

Throughout 2022

Throughout 2022, there were also rumblings of discontent about the operation of race control: from a refusal to put a barrier at a corner where two drivers crashed in Miami, through bungling the start process at Monaco, failing to get the Italian Grand Prix restarted after a safety car and, worst of all, sending a recovery vehicle out on track in conditions of almost zero visibility at Suzuka – reviving memories of Jules Bianchi’s ultimately fatal crash there eight years before.

FIA backs Andretti bid

January 2023

Discord between Ben Sulayem and F1 was obvious over Andretti’s bid to join the Formula 1 grid. Ben Sulayem offered public support for the Michael Andretti-led team to become an eleventh constructor, and approved its application, only for it to be rejected by Formula 1 in early 2024, reflecting widespread objections from the teams over having to share their revenue with an additional constructor.

Ben Sulayem questions F1 value

January 2023 

For the listed company that is F1, money and values are a sensitive subject, so Ben Sulayem incensed it when he posting a series of tweets in response to a news report claiming that Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund had tried and failed to buy F1 for $20bn.

Ben Sulayem referred to this as an “alleged inflated price tag”, adding that “any potential buyer is advised to apply common sense, consider the greater good of the sport and come with a clear, sustainable plan – not just a lot of money”.

It brought a swift rebuke from F1’s lawyers, who sent a letter claiming that the tweets “interfere with our rights in an unacceptable manner” and warning of “regulatory consequences” for “commenting on the value of a listed entity or its subsidiaries, especially claiming or implying possession of inside knowledge while doing so, risks causing substantial damage to the shareholders and investors of that entity”.

An FIA spokesperson said only that he had merely wished to express his personal opinion.

A note from the past

January 2023

Further alarm bells rang when an archived website emerged a few days later containing historic misogynistic remarks, in which Ben Sulayem said he did not “like women who think they are smarter than men, for they are not in truth”.

The comments were met with dismay and anger at a series that has been vocal in championing diversity in recent years. The FIA said the remarks “do not reflect the president’s beliefs”. 

A step back

February 2023

In response to the new rules restricting drivers’ freedom of speech, F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali stated that drivers “will never put a gag on anyone” and reiterated the importance of giving each “a platform to discuss their opinions in an open way.”

Less than a day after Domenicali’s statement, the FIA President announced he would be taking a step back from direct involvement in F1.

Cleared of interfering in race decisions

March 2024

Following allegations from a whistleblower, the FIA launched an investigation into the actions of its president, focusing on two races in the 2023 season where he was alleged to have interfered in officials’ decisions. It found no wrongdoing, and Ben Sulayem was exonerated.

The first claim, initially reported by the BBC, concerned the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix where Fernando Alonso served a five-second penalty during a pitstop. While waiting for the time to elapse, a mechanic pushed a rear jack onto the back of the car. This was flagged by Mercedes and deemed to have breached a rule that prevents work being carried out during a penalty. As a result, a further 10sec penalty was applied at the end of the race.

It was reported that, Ben Sulayem then contacted Sheikh Abdullah bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa — the FIA’s vice-president for sport for the Middle East and North Africa region — and called for the penalty to be revoked.

Aston Martin also appealed, offering evidence that the rules were not clear, and of other drivers going unpunished when the rear jack had touched their cars while serving penalties. Alonso’s 10-second penalty was overturned.

At the time, stewards justified the decision by referring to a discussion that had occurred internally between F1 teams and the FIA on the subject: “We concluded that there was no clear agreement, as was suggested to the stewards previously, that could be relied upon to determine that parties had agreed that a jack touching a car would amount to working on the car.”

A second allegation accused Ben Sulayem of attempting to prevent the new Las Vegas circuit from being certified by the FIA for racing. The whistleblower is reported to have said that the president had issued a request to find concerns that would prevent a certificate from being issued, therefore preventing the race from being held. F1 invested tens of millions of pounds into the race, and had focused much of its publicity on the event.