Moreover Leclerc is now in his sixth season at the Scuderia, and the team is still making mistakes, still squandering the inherent advantages of what has at times seemed to be the quickest car on the track. And Charles must take his share of the blame for that: the greatest drivers – the Schumachers and Hamiltons – lift everyone around them, thereby helping build teams that are so good, so consistent that they are capable of winning even when they don’t have the quickest car. So it would seem Charles Leclerc has far more to lose than gain by having Lewis as a team-mate.
Except this: I don’t believe a word of it. I think that whatever a move to Ferrari has done for Lewis Hamilton’s chance of taking the title, it’s done even more for those of Charles Leclerc.
For a start when a Lewis Hamilton joins the team, everyone raises their game. Do you really think Nico Rosberg would have won the title in 2016 without the role Lewis played in creating the world beating team for which they raced? I don’t. So Charles will benefit as much as Lewis if this happens.
Then there is the age thing, and it cannot be ignored. Yes, F1 is an easier place for an older driver to be these days, but the simple truth is that just two people in the history of F1 have won titles while older than Lewis will be at the end of his first season at Ferrari, and the most recent of them won 67 years ago. Lewis will be in his 40s when he drives a Ferrari in anger for the first time; at the same time Charles will be 27. And even if Lewis is not slowing down, it’s surely inconceivable that he’ll be getting any faster, while Charles is entering his prime.
If we do the same comparison to team-mates, in Charles’ six seasons to date, he’s been outpointed just once, a near identical success rate to Lewis.