F1's future was at Silverstone — if you watched this 1972 McLaren M19

F1

Within the historic demonstration run at the British Grand Prix was a 1972 McLaren M19 which — in one crucial area — was more advanced than even the next-generation 2026 F1 cars, writes Mark Hughes

David Brabham in Zero Petroleum powered McLaren M19 at Silverstone

Synthetic fuel-powered McLaren M19 ran on track during the British Grand Prix weekend

Zero

Mark Hughes

Those of you who attended the British Grand Prix may have enjoyed watching David Brabham demonstrating a 1972 McLaren M19, as raced in period by Denny Hulme and Peter Revson.

Those few laps with the Cosworth DFV’s bark bouncing off the surroundings were a nice aural and visual trip down memory lane for the older fans. But it actually represented something potentially significant for the future. Because that DFV was running on a fully synthetic e-fuel, made in Bicester by the Zero company which currently sponsors the Sauber team. You may recall that two years ago Sebastian Vettel demo-ed his own 1992 Williams FW14B, also at the British Grand Prix meeting, using renewable fuel. But that was biofuel. The McLaren M19 run was on e-fuel and there’s an important distinction. Biofuel is made using agricultural food stocks and specifically second-gen biofuel uses waste stock rather than primary. E-fuel on the other hand is made by a completely different process.

What we will likely see in F1 2026 will be biofuels produced by the existing big petro-chemical companies and although the regulations do allow for e-fuels, it’s a sector in an earlier stage of its development commercially than biofuels.

Paddy Lowe – who was instrumental in the creation of the active ride system of that Williams FW14B in the ‘90s – is a founding partner in the Zero e-fuel company. He was at Silverstone and explained some of the background to the fuel powering that old McLaren.

Related article

“We make e-fuels by reversing the process of combustion. When you combust a hydrocarbon fuel like gasoline or diesel you create water and carbon dioxide. It’s oxygen added to hydrogen and carbon. What we’re doing is gathering the hydrogen back out from water by electrolysis so you split water into hydrogen and oxygen. You have to use renewable electricity in the electrolysis to make this a renewable process. That can be solar, hydro, wind or thermonuclear. Then you gather carbon dioxide from the air. We synthesise those together to make a replica fuel.”

The process is known as petrosynthesis and there are several companies, mainly in the USA, embarking upon its manufacture on an exploratory scale. What is unusual about Zero’s production is that it is producing a high-octane fuel on site without need for a refinery.

“Bio gasoline is great,” continues Lowe, “so long as you are not depleting food production. [Because of that] it just doesn’t do the job in replacing fossil fuels if you do the maths. That’s the difference with e-fuels. There is unlimited production potential; it’s just a matter of building the equipment. You can replace all fossil fuels used today by this process.

“If you put 6% of Australia’s land area as a solar farm you’d make all the fossil fuel needed on earth, fully sustainably. In decades to come it won’t be imaginable that you’d dig the stuff out the ground. Why would you do that when it’s really difficult and would [by then] be more expensive and you are not necessarily able to make it on your own territory?”

David Brabham with Paddy Lowe in Silverstone pitlane

Lowe, at Silverstone with Brabham, is also supplying synthetic fuel for aircraft and trains

Zero Petroleum

For the moment e-fuel production is way more expensive than getting it from out the ground of course. It requires an enormous capital investment to make the reverse water gas shift reactors (which convert the carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide) and the Foscher-Tropsch reactors (which convert the mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen into liquids) on the required scale. But as with any new technology, it would become cheaper as production was scaled up.

“In as little as 10 years e-fuel will be around the same price as fossil fuels and after that becoming cheaper,” claims Lowe. “Twenty years ago wind and energy was a mad small-scale idea. Now the cheapest power station you could build in the UK would be an offshore wind farm, not a gas-fired power station. That wasn’t something anyone would have predicted 20 years ago. Like that, the technology will come and then it will come quickly.

“[The UN Climate Change] COP 28 Agreement for first time put in black and white that the world needs to move away from fossil fuels entirely. That is the direction. Quite often F1 is a pioneer in advancing journey of technology to commerciality. Our next step at Zero is to move to commercial scale, but we need commercial partners and the appropriate location. About 20% of our engineers are ex-F1 engineers including many of our senior team leaders. The way we work is becoming more and more like an F1 team every day in the way we’re pushing ahead with this technology at very high speed using many of the techniques deployed in F1.”