“I got the pole position and he jumped the start!” remembers Prost. “I didn’t know how good he was, but we knew… I understood. It was only in 1988 when I saw him in the same car that I knew how good he was. Then at our first test together in Imola I saw it was going to be difficult.”
Prost explains that both the competitive intensity and toxic atmosphere which soon developed at McLaren were not to his taste.
“I cannot say I enjoyed it the same, I cannot lie. Before I enjoyed racing, enjoyed fighting. Remember with Nelson [Piquet], we were going on holidays together the same year we were fighting for the championship in 1983.
“Keke was unbelievable, one of my best team-mates. Everybody said at the beginning of the year it would be a disaster. Then when Ayrton came we reached a level of performance and obviously you enjoy it a little bit less. I really suffered a lot, so you cannot enjoy it the same way.”
Senna wrapped his campaigns in a compelling narrative, implying that it was his divine right to win – something difficult for fans not to get caught up in. Prost analyses the difference in their ‘fire and ice’ approaches.
According to Frenchman, atmosphere soured after Senna’s arrival
Getty Images
“Ayrton represented more panache. I was the ‘Professor’, clinical. He was ‘mystic’ and people liked that.
“When he impressed me I must say it was in qualifying sometimes, I don’t remember when exactly. Never in race conditions. Never. In race conditions, in the warm-up, most of the time I was quicker.