“I got the pole position and he jumped the start!” remembers Prost. “I didn’t know how good he was, but we knew… I understood. It was only in 1988 when I saw him in the same car that I knew how good he was. Then at our first test together in Imola I saw it was going to be difficult.”
Prost explains that both the competitive intensity and toxic atmosphere which soon developed at McLaren were not to his taste.
“I cannot say I enjoyed it the same, I cannot lie. Before I enjoyed racing, enjoyed fighting. Remember with Nelson [Piquet], we were going on holidays together the same year we were fighting for the championship in 1983.
“Keke was unbelievable, one of my best team-mates. Everybody said at the beginning of the year it would be a disaster. Then when Ayrton came we reached a level of performance and obviously you enjoy it a little bit less. I really suffered a lot, so you cannot enjoy it the same way.”
Senna wrapped his campaigns in a compelling narrative, implying that it was his divine right to win – something difficult for fans not to get caught up in. Prost analyses the difference in their ‘fire and ice’ approaches.
“Ayrton represented more panache. I was the ‘Professor’, clinical. He was ‘mystic’ and people liked that.
“When he impressed me I must say it was in qualifying sometimes, I don’t remember when exactly. Never in race conditions. Never. In race conditions, in the warm-up, most of the time I was quicker.