1978 Dutch GP: How Lotus felt F1's fickle triumph and tragedy

F1

The 2024 Dutch Grand Prix was another race that Max Verstappen and Red Bull failed to win after two years of dominance – over 40 years ago, Zandvoort '78 was the story of total command for Lotus and Mario Andretti but, as Matt Bishop writes, fortunes can soon change

Mario Andretti Ronnie Peterson Lotus 1978 Dutch Grand Prix

1978 Dutch GP was a a high-watermark for Lotus – but what followed showed how quickly things can change in F1

Getty Images

When Max Verstappen kicked off the 2024 Formula 1 season with imperious back-to-back wins in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, then, after Carlos Sainz had had the impertinence to finish first in Australia, the brilliant Dutchman followed up those two victories with two more in Japan and China, most of us assumed that 2024 would end up panning out pretty much as 2022 and 2023 had. But, no, Verstappen has not won an F1 grand prix since June, in Spain, and it is now as-near-as-dammit September.

Sunday’s Dutch Grand Prix was won impressively by McLaren’s Lando Norris, but the Zandvoort circuit that our 2024-model-year heroes raced on is but a pale shadow of the old one. The first five turns – Tarzan, Gerlachbocht, Hugenholtz, Rob Slotemaker, and Scheivlak – are pretty similar to how they used to be, give or take a bit of banking, but the rest of the circuit is not. After Scheivlak the old Zandvoort used to continue south along superfast, sweeping, daunting curves laid out among sand dunes – Hondenvlack, Panorama, Pulleveld, Bos Uit, and Huzarenvlag – whereas now it turns west towards its infield in a way that Graham Hill might have dubbed Mickey Mouse, which is how he described the Le Mans Bugatti circuit on which thankfully only one French Grand Prix has ever been run (1967). Yes, Zandvoort’s new banking at Turns 3 and 14 makes an interesting change, but Turns 10, 11, and 12 are finicky and fiddly by comparison with anything on its fabulous original 1948 layout, which remained largely unaltered for the following 41 years. Much of it is now a golf course.

But times change; such is life; it is what it is; choose whatever cliché you like. I kicked off this column by saying that a few months ago most of us were girding ourselves to have to put up with the 2024 F1 season panning out pretty much as had 2022 and 2023. Well, it has not, which is a nice and welcome surprise, especially as F1 seasons like 2023 and 2022 are not at all rare, the explanation for which trend can be expressed as a simple syllogism: great cars are created by great teams; great teams hire great drivers; ergo, great drivers end up in great cars, and the result is that they do a lot of winning in them.

Max x Verstappen Red Bull 2024 Dutch GP

Is this truly the end of Red Bull and Verstappen’s dominance?

In 1950 Alfa Romeo won all six of the F1 grands prix (excluding the Indianapolis 500) that made up the first ever F1 world championship, Giuseppe Farina and Juan Manuel Fangio taking three wins each; Ferrari won seven grands prix out of seven (again, excluding Indy) in 1952, six of them falling to Alberto Ascari, who added five more grand prix wins and another world championship in 1953; Mercedes-Benz won five out of six (yes, excluding Indy again) in 1955, four going to Fangio; Lotus reigned more or less supreme in 1963 and 1965, thanks in no small measure to the brilliance of Jim Clark, and again in 1978, its rapid and beautiful 78 and its even more rapid and even more beautiful 79 stroked to a combined total of eight F1 grand prix wins by Mario Andretti and Ronnie Peterson; McLaren and Williams dominated F1 for the 11 seasons that spanned 1984 and 1994; Ferrari painted in rosso corsa our mind’s-eye memories of the early years of this century’s F1 dramas; and either Mercedes or Red Bull has won every F1 constructors’ world championship since 2010. In other words, domination is normal in F1.

But let’s go back to the old Zandvoort, shall we? And let’s focus on a race that was run there in one of the dominant seasons in my list above, 1978, not least because, if you are reading this column on the date on which it was published – i.e. August 27, 2024 – you are doing so exactly 46 years to the day after Andretti, Peterson, and their Lotus 79s finished the 1978 Grote Prijs van Nederland first and second.

From the archive

It was a stupendously impressive performance by them. Granted, Niki Lauda did his best to put up a fight, finishing a gutsy third in his Brabham-Alfa BT46 (sans fan by then of course), but it was the manner of Mario’s and Ronnie’s ascendancy that was so striking. They had qualified first and second, the only two drivers to post laps that would stop the watches before 77 seconds had elapsed. On race day they set off in line astern, the American half a second ahead of the Swede, and they drove all 75 laps in that formation, unchallenged and therefore unruffled by Lauda’s stout-hearted efforts to keep up with them, smoothly pulling away from the Brabham-Alfa despite both their Lotuses developing mechanical gremlins, a broken exhaust that was costing his Cosworth DFV 400rpm in Andretti’s case and fading brakes in Peterson’s. Mario crossed the finish-line 0.32sec ahead of Ronnie; Niki, despite charging hard at the end, was a further 12.21sec behind.

It was Lotus’s eighth F1 grand prix win of the year, its third on the trot, and its fourth one-two. Afterwards Andretti said: “That was just fantastic. I know I’ve used that word a lot this season, but I honestly don’t believe the 79 has ever been better than it was today.”

Yet, as Verstappen and Red Bull are now only too well aware, F1 domination can be a fickle thing, and what happened after Zandvoort 1978 was not only unpredictable, and therefore unpredicted, but also tragic. Andretti, who had won 11 F1 grands prix for Lotus in a 21-month purple patch that had begun at Fuji in October 1976, never won one again; and Peterson, who, by driving quite magnificently throughout 1978, had silenced those who had wondered whether he might be past his brilliant best, not only never won again, but also never scored points again, and indeed never finished a grand prix again. The reason for that was that he was fatally injured in the next one he started, at Monza two weeks later. As Andretti famously said on the Monday morning after that cursed Italian Grand Prix, having just been told the shocking news that his team-mate and good friend had succumbed to his injuries in hospital overnight, “Unhappily, racing is also this.” So it was. So it is, for it will never be truly safe, but it is far less dangerous now than it was then, thank god.

1978 Dutch Grand Prix start

Lotus leads 1-2 off the line at Zandvoort ’78

Getty Images

Lotus’s 79 had harnessed ground effect technology so well in 1978 – or so we all thought at the time – that even F1 insiders assumed that Colin Chapman’s cars would kick off 1979 with their sizeable performance advantage intact. For that reason Carlos Reutemann, who had won four F1 grands prix for Ferrari in 1978, had no qualms about deserting the Scuderia to join Andretti at Lotus for 1979. As things turned out, neither Carlos nor Mario won a single race that year, for Ligier, Williams, and Renault had all created new cars that used ground effect science and technology far better than Lotus ever had, and Ferrari built a powerful and bullet-proof car in which Jody Scheckter, ably supported by his team-mate Gilles Villeneuve, made almost no errors in his diligent bid to win the F1 drivers’ world championship; he succeeded.

Reutemann left Lotus for Williams after that one disappointing season – which with the benefit of hindsight we can hail as a wise move – but Andretti stayed loyal to Chapman for a fifth consecutive year. Carlos did well at Williams in 1980 – he won at Monaco and finished third in the F1 drivers’ world championship standings – but it was an annus horribilis for Mario. Of the season’s 14 grands prix he saw the chequered flag in only five, and just one of those finishes was a points-scoring one: sixth at Watkins Glen. He joined Alfa Romeo for 1981, and he began the season with an encouraging fourth place at Long Beach, but his next 14 F1 grands prix that year yielded eight DNFs and six finishes, none of which troubled the scorers.

From the archive

He announced his retirement from F1 at that point – he was no longer the sunny side of 40, after all – and he refocused his energies on IndyCar, with conspicuous success, finally calling it a day in 1994, by which time he was no longer the sunny side of 50. But his damp squib of a 1981 season in a difficult and unreliable Alfa had not in fact been the end of his F1 driving career, for he had made three ’supersub’ appearances in F1 in 1982 – one for Williams and two for Ferrari – and we who love racing can be very glad that he did. Why so? Because, at Monza, where he and his twin brother Aldo had fallen in love with racing as teenagers, he stuck a Ferrari 126C2 on the pole and raced it to third place. On the podium, alongside René Arnoux, who had won, and Patrick Tambay, second, cheered to the echo by the tifosi, he looked a bit like a proud but sheepish dad who had infiltrated his son’s victory ceremony by mistake.

And Peterson? When he was on song, no-one ever drove an F1 car faster. A few weeks before his death – which mismanaged medical catastrophe occurred on September 11, 1978 – he had agreed to join McLaren for 1979. He would never know it, but it was another of his bad career choices, and he had made quite a few of those. In a way that reminds me of Chris Amon and Fernando Alonso – superb drivers both who nonetheless so often seemed (Amon) or seem (Alonso) to be in the right teams at the wrong time – Peterson would have struggled with the 1979 McLaren M28, just as the the plucky John Watson did in his place.

2 Mario Andretti Ronnie Peterson Lotus 1978 Dutch Grand Prix

Andretti and Peterson enjoying Lotus domination – within six months the latter would be killed, and a year later the former and his team would fall from grace

Grand Prix Photo

We will never know where the greatest racing driver that Sweden has ever produced might have gone, or what he might have done, in 1980 and beyond. Would he have stayed at McLaren, and eventually enjoyed the success there that Watson and Lauda did in 1981, 1982, and 1983, and that Lauda and Alain Prost surpassed with triumphant domination in 1984, by which time he would have been 40? Or, disappointed and depressed by the wretched 1979 M28, would he have looked for an early way out of the McLaren team to land an alternative drive elsewhere? That would have been more like him, sadly. As I say, we will never know. All we can ever know, and all we can ever say therefore, is that he was one of the most freakishly gifted drivers whom any of us has ever seen.

I was at Brands Hatch in 1978, aged 15, to watch him put his gorgeous black and gold Lotus 79 on the pole, using rock-hard race tyres to drive a quali lap a quarter of a second quicker than the best that Andretti could manage on super-soft qualifying tyres. The way SuperSwede chucked that wonderful car around that day was prodigiously impressive, and I will never forget having been there to see him do it.