MPH: Can easier-to-drive Ferrari beat bold Red Bull in 2024?

Mark Hughes

Ferrari has taken a new approach toward its 2024 F1 car, focusing on drivability instead of a bold new design. But, as Mark Hughes asks, will it be enough to beat Red Bull's progressive title-defender?

Red Bull Ferrari 2024 F1

"Steady and diligent" vs "brave and ambitious"

Getty Images

Mark Hughes

During pre-season testing it was interesting to hear both Carlos Sainz and Charles Leclerc comment favourably upon the improvement in the Ferrari’s balance compared to last year’s car. Couple that with the very promising race simulation run of Sainz on Thursday which suggested its tyre degradation was a whole lot better than last year, and we potentially have the basis of something promising for Scuderia fans. With the proviso of course that it may not be enough – depending upon what Red Bull in particular has been able to achieve.

At the launch of this car, the SF24, technical director Enrique Cardile underlined that although this was a clean sheet design, the philosophy has not been to re-invent the wheel but to give its drivers something in which they can have confidence to push. Although last year’s car could be quick – and averaged only around 0.15sec slower than the totally dominant Red Bull in qualifying – it could be something of a Russian roulette car, especially through high-speed corners.

One lap it would be fine, the next it would snap viciously out of line, seemingly dependent upon which way and how hard the wind was blowing. The speeds at which this generation of cars are attaining through fast corners and their sheer bulk means that when they let go, they do so at very high lateral-g and take up a lot of the track width. It’s not an easy recovery, nor a soothing one. Even Charles Leclerc, perhaps the driver most at ease with oversteer of anyone on the grid, did not like it.

Ferrari Charles Leclerc

Charles Leclerc crashes out of Q3 in pursuit of pole position for 2023 Miami Grand Prix

Getty Images

There was an aerodynamic stall seemingly inherent to the outwash aerodynamic principle of the car, whereby the big bluff sidepod fronts would create a high-pressure area in front of them which the oncoming airflow would swerve around to avoid, thereby out-washing the flow away from the body sides. In theory this is a very efficient way of conditioning that airflow, as the low-pressure area behind the sidepods and between the rear wheels then pulls it back in, to do its work around the diffuser. But there was something about it which made that flow less than totally robust.

Related article

2024 F1 pre-season testing: what we learned from Day 3
F1

2024 F1 pre-season testing: what we learned from Day 3

Ferrari once again topped the timesheets on the final day of pre-season testing in Bahrain, invigorating hope in those hoping for a genuine title-battle in 2024. Unfortunately, Max Verstappen and…

By Cambridge Kisby

Cardile explained it as being, “Down to the shape of the aero map. Intrinsically, every F1 car when you apply yaw loses downforce. It’s related to tyre wake management. The problem is how much do you lose? The wind is an amplifier of the yaw. So the more you lose in yaw, the more you’ll suffer from wind. Related to this is the driver confidence and how peaky the performance is. With the right condition, you have more performance but a certain type of corner with the wind, the driver doesn’t know when the gust will happen.”

The aim with this car, which has surrendered the fat sidepod fronts of the previous two cars, has been to, “Take on board what the drivers have told us and turned those ideas into engineering reality with the aim of giving them a car which is easier to drive and therefore easier to get the most out of and push to its limits. We did not set ourselves any design constraints other than delivering a strong and honest racing car which can reproduce on the race track what we see in the wind tunnel.”

So there is no soaring ambition built into the concept of this car. Rather, it’s an attempt at a good hygienic car without vices based around aero principles now well-established elsewhere. This seems to have been achieved if its form in testing is any guide. It has a good driveable balance, it’s no longer chewing its tyres (although we await to see how it does around a track more demanding of the fronts rather than the very rear-limited Sakhir circuit) and although it still looks a very lively drive on low-fuel, both drivers are reporting that there’s no malice in that liveliness. Unlike last year. They can drive it like that quite comfortably. There is lap time in that level of confidence.

Ferrari F1

Ferrari

Ferrari F1 Motor Sport

Could Ferrari finally bring the title fight to Red Bull?

Getty Images

So where does it look like Ferrari is standing on the eve of the season? It certainly looks to be Red Bull’s closest rival. But in contrast to the Ferrari, the new RB20 is highly ambitious in concept. Far from resting on its laurels, Red Bull appears to have fundamentally re-assessed how to resolve one of the key conflicts inherent in this generation of cars – that of a consistent balance through the corner. Somehow shrinking the radiator masses has allowed them to be brought down lower and more centralised, respectively lowering the centre of gravity and the polar moment of inertia. So it potentially should get the quick turn in without that building to mid-corner oversteer. There should be less momentum to direction change and therefore less need to induce a false understeer in the turn-in phase in order to keep it stable later in the corner. But it’s a very different car to the dominant RB19 and there may yet be problems associated with that.

Does steady and diligent beat brave and ambitious? Sometimes. But in F1, not usually.