I was sitting next to my friend and fellow journalist Peter Windsor in the Spa press room at the time. Together we watched the next lap, in numbed silence. As the two cars rounded La Source and began the run up through Eau Rouge and Raidillon to Les Combes once again, Peter turned to me and said: “I bet he doesn’t pass him.”
“I bet he does,” I replied.
We now know that Häkkinen did indeed pass Schumacher – and Ricardo Zonta, too – in a move that has rightly gone down in racing folklore as one of the greatest ever F1 overtaking manoeuvres. But in the context of this column it is the callous violence of Schumacher’s chop on the previous lap that we are considering. After the race I spoke to Mika, as I often did in those days. He was delighted with his win — understandably — but he was still shaken by the events of the previous lap. In parc ferme the two men had spoken, at Häkkinen’s instigation, and the subject had been the near cataclysm, not the spectacular overtake. Mika told me that his exact words had been: “Don’t try that on me ever again.”
An S-tier overtake for the ages 👏👏👏
Mika Hakkinen performs ‘The Zonta’#F1 pic.twitter.com/HSg3ojqCnK
— Formula 1 (@F1) March 28, 2020
Afterwards, Schumacher denied that there had been contact. Häkkinen was privately adamant that there had been. Eight years later, by which time I had joined McLaren as its comms/PR chief, I was shown the front-wing end-plate from Häkkinen’s car, which Martin Whitmarsh had retained as a keepsake. It was broken, and flecked with tyre marks left by Schumacher’s rear Bridgestone.
3. Jerez 1997
What Michael Schumacher did to Jacques Villeneuve at Jerez in 1997 was remarkably similar to what he had done to Damon Hill at Adelaide three years before, with one important difference: it did not work. In 1997, as had been the case in 1994, Schumacher was leading his rival in the F1 drivers’ world championship by a single point, 78 against 77, and again he took the lead at the start of the race. Again, Villeneuve slotted in behind.
By lap 48 it was clear that Villeneuve’s Williams was capable of lapping faster than Schumacher’s Ferrari – and at Turn 6, a sharp right-hander, he made his move. He braked later than Michael had, he had the inside line, and the cars were level. There was no doubt that he would win the corner, the race, and the F1 drivers’ world championship. Again, that prospect was unbearable for Schumacher, and he steered hard to his right, using his Ferrari as a battering ram with which to inflict what he hoped would be a terminal blow.
I was in the Jerez press room at the time, and I was almost deafened by a roar of disapproval from dozens of angry journalists nearby. If you were watching the race on TV in the UK, you would have heard Martin Brundle’s now famous words: “That didn’t work, Michael. You hit the wrong part of him, my friend. I don’t think that will cause Villeneuve a problem.”
As so often, Brundle was spot-on. So was Jacques Laffite, who was commentating on French TV at the same time, and shouted “Quel con!” – which you do not need to be a scholar of French to translate.
Schumacher’s Ferrari was irreparably damaged, and he stood trackside for the next few laps, watching Villeneuve nurse his damaged Williams to third place, thereby earning points sufficient to overhaul Schumacher in the F1 drivers’ world championship and become Canada’s first and so far only F1 world champion.
The Jerez stewards declared the Schumacher-Villeneuve coming-together a “racing incident”, which clearly it was not, and their judgment caused a media outcry. Two weeks later Schumacher was summoned to an FIA disciplinary hearing in Paris, where he was disqualified from the 1997 F1 world drivers’ championship but was allowed to keep his wins, his podiums, and his points. No, we journalists could not work that one out either. FIA President Max Mosley explained the ruling by stating that Schumacher’s actions had been “deliberate but not premeditated”. Yeah, right.
2. Monaco 2006
It was the arrogant cynicism of Michael Schumacher’s professional foul at Monaco in 2006 that took the breath away, for it was neither violent nor dangerous, as were some of his actions described above. On the contrary, it took place at 10mph (16km/h), at which speed he faked losing control of his Ferrari, stopping it at Rascasse in order to block the narrow available track space and thereby prevent Renault’s Fernando Alonso, who had been running behind him, from pinching his pole position.
The FIA stewards’ verdict was damning, for it stated that they had been “left with no alternative but to conclude that the driver [Schumacher] deliberately stopped his car on the circuit in the last few minutes of qualifying at a time at which he had thus far set the fastest lap time”. They added: “This is a breach of 2006 F1 sporting regulations article 116, and therefore a driving infringement. Article 112 enables the stewards to delete any number of a driver’s qualifying times for a driving infringement, which decision is not susceptible to appeal.” Significantly, earlier that day, the same stewards had deleted Alonso’s Renault team-mate Giancarlo Fisichella’s fastest three qualifying times, for impeding David Coulthard’s Red Bull, noting that “such action may not have been deliberate”. In Schumacher’s case no such disclaimer was entertained, and all his qualifying times were duly deleted, relegating him to the back of the grid.
In the post-qualifying press conference Schumacher sought to justify his actions to a disbelieving posse of angry journalists, of whom I was one. “You’d better look at the TV footage,” he told us. “You’ll see me locking-up and running out of road.” We had looked at the TV footage, and we had seen him doing no such thing.