“I worked together with the test-bench department to have something to manage the torque, to clean the peaks, to define the power reduction and how to manage the gearshifts, spark by spark.
“Riders would come into the garage, scared, so we tried to calm down the engine with the electronics, but at first there was no inertial platform, we had no gyros or accelerometers, so we didn’t know if the bike was leaning, if it was making a wheelie or anything else! So we would calm down the engine for one part of the track, but then it was no good in another part of the track.”
This was when Bonora helped lay the foundations of modern motorcycle electronics. Inertial platforms (IPs), which had been used in aeroplanes for decades, first appeared in Formula 1 cars in the 1990s where they managed traction control, active suspension and so on, so MotoGP’s first IPs came from F1.
“We developed our first inertial platform on the 2004 Cube – five centimetres square, with three gyros and three accelerometers inside. This was a big, big step, a massive step, massive, which wasn’t easy, because I’ve never seen a car do a wheelie or lean in the corners! A MotoGP bike is an aeroplane that flies on the ground, so from the gyros and accelerometers you have to calculate everything – the roll, the yaw, the lean. We took at least three years to find a way to stabilise the lean-angle calculations.
Regis Laconi wrestling with the original RS Cube in 2002
“That was an unbelievable era for the Aprilia Racing electronics department, because everybody who worked there developed themselves a lot and some things we learned then we still use now.
“Aprilia were the first in MotoGP with a fully ride-by-wire throttle system. It wasn’t easy because there was a disconnection between throttle opening and torque demand. The problem was maybe too much technology, but we had to start and put everything on the table. Typically the best way to smooth the engine is with the throttle [butterflies], because it makes everything smoother, but for fast power reduction [to avoid highside crashes] you have to use ignition advance, so we worked a lot on that.”
Aprilia’s first four-stroke project ended in 2004 when Piaggio bought the company and ended the Cube adventure. The bike had been the first MotoGP four-stroke to break the 200mph barrier [during the 2002 Italian Grand Prix at Mugello] but hadn’t managed to finish in the top five.
“From 2004 I worked on two-stroke engine control, so Aprilia were the first to bring traction control to two-strokes. We made our inertial platform smaller and smaller and brought it to the 250 in 2008.”
First time out with traction control, Alex Debon rode his RSW250 to pole position at the 2008 Qatar Grand Prix and a few weeks later scored his first victory, using TC to manage slick tyres on a damp track at Le Mans.
“In 2005 we started to see the future. We had close to 30 bikes in 125 GPs and close to 25 bikes in 250, so we developed our own ECU, for performance and for financial reasons, because we had so many bikes.
“Like always, teams asked for more performance, which meant having better management of the ignition spark, because in our 250, if you weren’t able to keep the ignition advance within zero point one degree, the engine stopped itself, so you had to have the maximum control of the spark, for maximum performance and to reduce detonation.
Aprilia celebrating Marco Bezzecchi’s 2025 British GP win, his first for the Noale brand. Bonora is far left
Aprilia
“We started from scratch with our ECU. We developed everything – the electronics, the firmware, the software, everything, working not only with our electronics department but also with our dynamic control department, so this was another step.”
And then another change. MotoGP replaced 250 GP bikes with Moto2 at the end of 2009, so Aprilia focused on making its new RSV4 superbike a winner in WSBK.
“We brought our 250 ECU and everything we had learned from the Cube and the 250 in terms of traction control to the RSV4, with Max Biaggi [who rode the RSV4 to the 2010 and 2012 WSBK titles].
“Initially it wasn’t easy. It was a pleasure to have Max because he was so demanding, which was the correct way to push. We worked a lot, in particular on the ride-by-wire, to smooth and clean maximum power. And we started to better understand where the bike was, through the inertial platform, whereas with the Cube we hadn’t known what situation the bike was in. We learned a lot in WSBK about what’s necessary to keep the bike on the ground all the time.